Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Previous message: Lefty: "Re: Axiom of a new physics."
- Maybe in reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL"
- Next in thread: Tom Simonds: "Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:21:31 -0400
2 cylinders 120 cubic inch tall each .
One is filled with water and the water is the 2 stoke piston . at 60
rpm they will run on gas and air like any two stoke BUT use liquid
oxygen for a booster.
They drive a 24x1 inch sliding vane rotor that can slide out up to 2
inch of vane at 500 rpm.
Thats far more power than any 4 cylinder car and is the same cubic
inch . It will use the same amount of fuel and air to fill the
cylinders
each time they take a stroke.
The 4 cylinder runs at 4000 RPM and filles the intake stroke 1000
times per minute.
The liquid piston vane rotor will run at 60 rom and fill the intake 60
times per minute.
1000///60 1000 to 60 100//6
thats 20 % of the fuel ,,,but then the water boils and O2 is injected
as a fuel booster so the fel must be backed off to controle te boil ..
10 % of the fuel .
10 times what ever your milage is.
YOUR 55 mpg hybird would get 550 mpg with the whale 7 engine.
Your 277 hp 25 mpg cars would do about 300 mpg.
The bigger they get the better they get.
100,000 rpm ship diesels run 100 rpm MAX.
service speed .
So does the liquid piston.
There is no data on the LPE other than mine.
I invented the liquid piston engine and the sliding vane rotor and
director and the run programs .
Not even nuke power plants can compeat.
Conect a LPE up to a supperconductor AC motor and electric drive rules.
- Next message: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Previous message: Lefty: "Re: Axiom of a new physics."
- Maybe in reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL"
- Next in thread: Tom Simonds: "Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|