Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals

From: eleaticus (eleaticus_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 10/16/04 

Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:08:47 -0500

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:41719725.C54F564F@hate.spam.net...
> Eleaticus wrote:
> [snip lies]
>
> > (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
> > (c) Eleaticus/Oren C. Webster
> > Thnktank@concentric.net
> [snip 1300 lines of trolled garbage]
>
> eleaticus, Oren Webster, is a despised and stooopid troll,
> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Crimes.html
> "Several crimes against logic and science" Ha ha ha!
>
> Originally trolled across sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
> alt.physics sci.math sci.answers alt.answers news.answers
>
> Psychotic ineducable boring troll Eleaticus,
>
> Internal inconsistencies in SR (meaning inconsistencies of a purely
> mathematical logical nature) automatically lead to contradictions in
> number theory, itself, and arithmetic, since the mathematics of
> Minkowski geometry is equiconsistent with the theory of real numbers
> and with arithmetic.

Yes, indeed, inconsistencies of a purely mathematical LOGICAL nature are
implicit in SR. It is idiocy at its base.

Which is why as the 100th anniversary approaches the basic spatial
contraction effect has not been found, nor will it have been found at year
200, 500,. 1000, etc.

And any True Believer cretins who still exist will still post complete
irrelevancies such as the links you continue to 'provide'.

"How dare you say my soups suck!" exclaimed the angry chef, "my peach pie is
perfect!"

eleaticus

Relevant Pages
Loading