Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO
From: Michael Davis (mdavis19_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 10/17/04
- Next message: Pierre: "Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Previous message: Jack Sarfatti: "More on NASA Space-Probe Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Data"
- In reply to: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Next in thread: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:17:08 GMT
Tim K. wrote:
> "Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:82e92692348af83e687d69d3888bfa92@news.meganetnews.com...
>
>
>>Hi Tim,
>
>
> Howdy - how've you been?!
Not bad. Just too busy to spend much time on Usenet these days.
>
>
>>I see you have discovered Little Tommy (The same one I mention in my sig
>>all the time). He's quite the little kook, almost as much fun as Twonky.
>>He styles himself as some sort of scientist, but spouts nothing but
>>meaningless technobabble and bitches at everyone else for not being
>>scientific enough. He's the classic example of a kid who rode the short
>>bus to school, but since he once read "General Science for Complete
>>Idiots" (and understood about 5% of it), he now thinks he is another
>>Einstein. One look at his truly horrible web *** is all you should
>>need to see the true depths of his nuttyness. And like all good kooks,
>>he has a lot of trouble keeping track of who said what. That's why he
>>keeps claiming you said things I don't see anywhere in the thread. Oh,
>>and by the way, he's a saucerhead too. Have fun slapping him around. Be
>>warned though that the little sissy boy will killfile you after a while.
>>But as stupid as he is, he can't keep track of who he has and hasn't
>>killfiled. So don't be surprised if after a while he starts responding
>>to you again.
>
>
> heh, I took a look at his site and never got past "The cosmos is composed of
> compost" or whatever it was. He seems to like the term optical photons
> too - I reckon he's never had a sunburn and thinks he can see IR.
It's just a kooky redundancy like saying "wet water" or "cold ice."
Little Tommy just wanted to be sure we knew he was talking about light,
and not Gauge Bosons or neutrinos or something else.
>
> He had a nifty "Twonky" meltdown after the hurricane posts. If someone
> wants to claim that hurricanes are more expensive than before, he has the
> right metric, but he obviously doesn't comprehend relative and absolute
> measures.
Yeah, this hurricane season has the global warming kooks in full froth.
They see four hurricane hits on one state in one season as "proof" of
something or other. But since it also happened 118 years ago, long
before any alleged human caused global warming, I don't see any connection.
> What the hell did these loons do before usenet...
Well, in the good old days, people like them were locked up in insane
asylems. Wouldn't it be fun to put Twonky and Tommy in the same rubber
room and watch them froth away at each other?
-- The Evil Michael Davis(tm) http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/ http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536 Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club "There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum
- Next message: Pierre: "Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Previous message: Jack Sarfatti: "More on NASA Space-Probe Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Data"
- In reply to: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Next in thread: Tim K.: "Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]