Re: Gravitomagnetism
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: Eunometic: "Re: Boycott Icelandic Fish"
- Previous message: ray: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- In reply to: Louis Nielsen: "Re: Gravitomagnetism"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Gravitomagnetism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Oct 2004 17:36:15 -0700
Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk (Louis Nielsen) wrote in message news:<9bb7234f.0410171057.6cd87121@posting.google.com>...
> Robert and Ziggi please read the following:
>
> A Maxwell-analogous Gravitational Theory with two gravitational
> fields.
>
> By Louis Nielsen Denmark http://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> More than thirty five years ago (in the sixties) I suggested and
> derived a Maxwell-analogous gravitational theory with two
> gravitational fields. The two fields are the 'gravito-static' field of
> Newton and the 'gravito-magnetic' field, which is a gravitational
> rotation-field. The two fields exist around matter in relative
> motions.
NASA, spent time on that. We (C-Dyn) visited the experiment
at MSFC, and examined Ning Li's (sp) refereed theories in
Physical Review, (aka gravity attentuation). We couldn't
make it work in any theoretical assumptions that were consistent,
(that certainly does not mean it's impossible).
So far, our inhouse theories can't make "frame dragging"
work either, for similiar reasons, we'll need to wait and
see what GP-b finds, and go from there.
Ken S. Tucker
- Next message: Eunometic: "Re: Boycott Icelandic Fish"
- Previous message: ray: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- In reply to: Louis Nielsen: "Re: Gravitomagnetism"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Gravitomagnetism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]