Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
From: The Ghost (the_ghostbuster_at_netzero.com)
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: Linønut: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Previous message: Mitchell: "Re: Are all QM interactions measurements?"
- In reply to: Vladan: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Oct 2004 18:11:50 -0700
Vladan <luxey1@eunet.yu> wrote in message news:<qc88m0dcttjuml2cj1mph4c508tm768q62@4ax.com>...
> So, why they refer to this as to Dopler distortin, instead to
> simply call it modulation, phase difference, shift,... or whatever, is
> beyond me.
Good question. The answer is that you are dealing with arrogant,
technically-inept idiots. Bob Cain is well known for his technical
incompetence and for mindlessly pulling equations and terminology out
of thin air. Harry Olson, in his classic 1957 book "Acoustical
Engineering", appropriately refers to this so-called Doppler
distortion as "Frequency Modulation Distortion" and refers to previous
work on the matter dating back to 1943. This is not the first time
that Bob Cain has demonstrated his total ignorance of previous work on
technical matters about which he is pontificating, and it most
certainly will not be the last.
- Next message: Linønut: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Previous message: Mitchell: "Re: Are all QM interactions measurements?"
- In reply to: Vladan: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]