Re: A PostScript printer at home ?
From: Linønut (linønut_at_bone.com)
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Previous message: The Ghost: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: ray: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:12:01 -0500
ray poked his little head through the XP firewall and said:
> I don't, but let me fille in a little info for you. Most PostScript
> printers are lasers - there are some high end inkjets, as well. The
> inkjets are quite expensive and will be quite costly to operate. So, let's
> talk lasers. There are very few true PostScript printers available any
> more (probably due to licensing costs due Adobe); most run a PostScript
> emulator on top of another page description language, and are slower than
> molasses. New PostScript capable printers are expensive.
I can sort of vouch for this. Printing pages from my Linux laptop (using
enscript -- they were source-code modules) to a Windows printer was much
slower than printing them from Windows, and the reason was almost surely
Postscript processing.
-- Penguins love icebergs.
- Next message: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Previous message: The Ghost: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: ray: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "Re: A PostScript printer at home ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|