Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?
From: Victor (Victor_at_com.com)
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: what is the relation between force and energy?"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed)"
- In reply to: Pierre: "Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Next in thread: beavith: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: beavith: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: EjP: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Double-A: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Matt Giwer: "Hubble is ancient history"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:37:22 +0200
Pierre wrote:
> Don't forget Bush wants the end of Hubble and want s to deicde what's
> good in science...
Actually it is NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe who decided that fixing
Hubble is not worth an astronaut's life or losing another shuttle. A
board of investigation was set up to determine the risks involved. I
personally think the risk is not that high and that a human service
mission should go ahead as planned.
Wrt. the US space program - I prefer Bush's Vision for Space
Exploration. From what I have read on Space.com, Kerry is still stuck
in a 'low-Earth orbit' research mentality. With Kerry as president,
space enthusiasts like us can kiss promising missions like the Jupiter
Ice Moons and Pluto-Kuiper Express missions good-bye.
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: what is the relation between force and energy?"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed)"
- In reply to: Pierre: "Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Next in thread: beavith: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: beavith: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: EjP: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Double-A: "Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?"
- Reply: Matt Giwer: "Hubble is ancient history"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|