Re: A Challenge for the Experts
From: Eugene Shubert (GalileoProject002_at_everythingimportant.org)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen: "Re: D E L U SI O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E !"
- Previous message: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Oct 2004 23:16:25 -0700
news:<x1Vcd.2739$ZV5.1283@news.flashnewsgroups.com>...
> news:416f35b4@sys13.hou.wt.net...
> > news:sJFbd.19$8I5.12@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
> > > news:416db7eb@sys13.hou.wt.net...
> > >> news:MMfbd.20589$pM5.1611@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
> >
> http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
>
> Your derivation explicitly assumes e-synching. By definition, this assumes
> the existence light signals. And the use of e-synching -- by definition --
> assumes the second postulate holds.
I think you're reading from a script and have no idea what my
derivation assumes.
> The paper assumes that e-synching holds, correct?
Believe what you like. Most critics who have actually read my paper
are certain that I begin with the Galilean transformation and then
invoke a wild clock resynchronization procedure. In general, most
suspect that I confuse the physics somehow (beyond their ability to
understand) and with mathematical trickery and the power of suggestion
that I only make it appear that I derive the Lorentz transformation
from the Galilean transformation.
You're claiming to be able to see explicitly where I use the second
postulate. I can only view your claim as an endorsement to the
legitimacy of my magic act. You're the second person who has said
that I'm using genuine Einsteinian postulates. Thank you!
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
Eugene Shubert
- Next message: Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen: "Re: D E L U SI O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E !"
- Previous message: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: A Challenge for the Experts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
