Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use??

From: Maleki (maleki_m__at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/21/04 

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:37:59 -0500

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:52:00 -0700, Rick wrote:

> "Maleki" <maleki_m_@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:m1fkzh0xlxt2$.iu3jacilq3tp.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>> Bush for a president has unique characteristics, very
>> valuable for USA (and elsewhere) at this time. He listens to
>> good advice, rather than following myopic, selfish, rigid
>> Washington formulas.
>
> That's a remarkable claim, considering the one consistent
> criticism of Bush, even from many in his own party is that he
> does not listen to the best available advice, and instead attempts
> to form his own realities that bear no resemblance to the truth.
>

He has been resisting the pro-Israeli "advice" in favor of
what's right for USA, and not just for Israel. The
pro-Israeli elements even started to resign from his
administration to backstab him for this. I'm telling you,
someone's noise is the other person's data. Right now Bush
is the best for USA. Things are getting (have begun!) too
dangerous for partisanship crap.

> I'm copying the following unformatted transcript for Google's
> archive, of a speech given last Monday by Al Gore at
> Georgetown University. Historians will know that at least a few
> Americans were aware of the truth during the Bush era, and
> knew the truth about this man -- a man who, for fun as a kid,
> liked to shove firecrackers down the throats of frogs and watch
> them explode; who financed both his campaigns for governor
> of Texas on the backs of medical malpractice victims; who, as
> governor, watched in glee while 150 Americans, including 62
> year-old grandmothers were murdered under the guise of
> "justice"; and who, while as president, was responsible for
> misleading America into war under false pretense and therefore
> is responsible for war crimes and the deaths and injuries of
> nearly 10,000 Americans and over 30,000 Iraqi civilians.
>

What a load of crap.

I was in Texas when Bush won the governer's seat against an
extremely popular incumbent. I saw the political pamphlets
he printed, as a matter of fact I was employed at that time
in the printing firm that printed them for him! He had a
policy of not attacking his opponent but agreeing to her
good points and trying to be better than her for Texans, if
he could. So along each opposing pamphlet he would print a
_supporting_ pamphlet but also showing by simple means that
he was yet better than her. This strategy won him the seat
because people in Texas are not fools (it's the only state
that still resembles something of what USA once was).

He ran that office like no other ones before him. For the
first time since I was there (since 1978) the entire
neighborhoods would suddenly get empty of heroin and heroin
dealers. Individuals that would get in and out of jail as if
it was a weekend holiday resort suddenly were landed there
with 20+ years on their calendars to mark off. You wouldn't
see them anymore. They're still there! Crime dropped,
employment florished, loafers found themselves looking for
jobs like others... . I saw this with my own eyes. Close
hand. When you people voted him president you didn't quite
know who you'd chosen. Neither did those behind September
11. But I knew.

Individually, this man had always been a non-conformist
towards balony traditions. That's how he's managed to keep
himself open. He is different from a typical Washington
politician. Before he became the Governor the media in Texas
had ridiculed him for ages, calling him "bum", and his
so-called advisors and family would force him to "go get a
nice job to build your political career," and crap like
that, and he would respond to them, "go to hell." _Crap_ is
not what USA needs today for its overal politics, because
problems around the world are seeping in. You need a good
listener with minimal ties to myopic trends and tendencies
to slowly lead it to safety and remedy the problem. Just
like Nixon. It is time for putting things back in order
after twenty years of generating problems.
 

> I've been saying it since day one of Bush's presidency: if he
> isn't the antichrist, he's doing one hell of an impersonation.
>
> Rick
>

You're lucky that you have him. 

-- 
     tA nageryad tefl key nushad laban
     tA nageryad abr key khandad chaman
                         "Mowlana"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use??
    ... He listens to ... > criticism of Bush, even from many in his own party is that he ... > does not listen to the best available advice, ... politician. ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: OT - Re: Bushs wiretaps - legal or illegal? (was Even Oprah now believes in the truth)
    ... I have written to>>my senators and representative a number of times urging them to repeal>>the law in its entirety. ... It was after all a Democratic proposal, but Bush agreed>to it and signed the law creating it. ... Personally, I judge him, like any politician, on an>>>issue-by-issue basis. ... >>>The Republican claimed to be financially conservative and defenders of>>our rights. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Scarborough on Bush
    ... The greatest political gift a politician can receive from enemies is the gift of being underestimated. ... Democrats have always played into Republican presidents' hands by dismissing them as dimwitted dunces who somehow stumbled their way into the most powerful position on Earth. ... Former administration officials still close to the White House will tell you Mr. Bush detests dissent, embraces a narrow world view and is intellectually incurious. ... Worse for this White House is the fact that George W. Bush has daily smackdowns with the English language and the English language usually wins. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Effects of transit on congestion
    ... successful politician without much in the way of talent. ... much less intelligent than Bush is or Reagan was. ... Gore was perceived as more intellectual than Bill Clinton, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: Google Maps New Orleans
    ... Congressman, Governor, or other big wig shows up, Security details must be made, which pulls much needed man power away from getting the job done. ... Can you honestly give me a good reason for ANY politician to show up down there at anytime during this disaster? ... likely require a lot of security, and that resources could be better spent in relief ... Oh, right, the previous poster seems to be saying, credit Bush with any plan that had been formulated decades ago for evacuating major population centers BUT do not blame his for the plan's inadequacy. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)