100% of the evidence supports a 757 at the Pentagon.
From: Brian Voth For President (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B)"
- Previous message: Brian Voth For President: "Re: 757 Rips Antenna Off Of Jeep Cherokee!"
- In reply to: John Griffin: "Re: Another Scholarly Refutation of the Pentagon Fraud"
- Next in thread: John Griffin: "Re: 100% of the evidence supports a 757 at the Pentagon."
- Reply: John Griffin: "Re: 100% of the evidence supports a 757 at the Pentagon."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Oct 2004 20:24:32 GMT
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in
news:Xns958A6EE623E6Ethathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4:
> Brian Voth For President <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
>
>> John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9589C193D7294thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4:
>>
>>> 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
>>>>> 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
>>>>>>> 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sir Cumference <me@this.moc> wrote in news:btCdnVMqH_duaOjcRVn-
>>>>>>>> oQ@gbronline.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess you can't debunk it...even if you wanted to.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no reason to debunk a farce.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Run! Away!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh ***! This is too fucking funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You feeling minatory here, while beating yourself to death, kid?!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple of guys were hauling a load of sheep across a river.
>>>>>>> They ran into something and the boat started to sink. Let's call
>>>>>>> these guys "The Normal Guy" and "You." The Normal Guy said "Get
>>>>>>> your life jacket and jump!" You said "What about the sheep?" The
>>>>>>> smarter one said "*** the sheep!" You said "All of them?" and
>>>>>>> ended up going down with the sheep.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Debunk that, imbecile. Try to understand that this challenge is
>>>>>>> precisely the same as yours, imbecile. (Except that I might have
>>>>>>> written the lamest pun of the month while you just collected and
>>>>>>> parroted a load of mindless horse***.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTE: The following verbal flatulence has been {edited for
>>>>>>> accuracy}:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ASCE Report Proves {to an idiot} that No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>>>>>>>> http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No 757 Hit The Pentagon, {says the dumbest sumbitch in
>>>>>>>> Washington} http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> New Online Video Proves {to the brain dead} that No 757 Hit The
>>>>>>>>Pentagon
>>>>>>>> http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shitforbrains, you keep forgetting to tell me why you so
>>>>>>> desperately want to find a way to reject all the relevant facts
>>>>>>> here, and where you think you could go with this idiotic nonsense
>>>>>>> if you managed that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those are certainly a lot of pertinent facts you have, John.
>>>>>
>>>>> The monsyllabic replies you've been posting aren't nearly as
>>>>> amusing as your tantrums or that simpering little snivel, but it's
>>>>> fun to have watched you reduce yourself to that. I'm betting you'll
>>>>> post followups to those articles, since you're the dumbest (*) of
>>>>> the ignoramuses puttering around with this nonissue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you want to answer my questions about your psychological
>>>>> and emotional problems, doofus? You have this sick compulsion to
>>>>> display them, so why not take that next little step? It could be
>>>>> therapeutic. So once again, why do you desperately want to reject
>>>>> all the relevant facts, and where would you go from there if you
>>>>> could make a case?
>>>>>
>>>>> (*) I thought *** Eastman was dumber than you, but I see that that
>>>>> fucking idiot has brains enough to keep out of sight.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ASCE Report Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>>>> http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
>>>>
>>>> No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>>>> http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>>>>
>>>> New Online Video Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>>>> http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
>>>>
>>>> Squirm...
>>>
>>> Why are you afraid to try to debunk the story I wrote for you? Here
>>> it is again. Do your best. Keep in mind that 100% of the facts
>>> relevant to the crash at the Pentagon crash the stupid story you
>>> pieced together by copying bull*** from that fucking idiot Eastman
>>> and some other remarkably lame and dumb fuckheads.
>>>
>>> A couple of guys were hauling a load of sheep across a river. They
>>> ran into something and the boat started to sink. Let's call these
>>> guys "The Normal Guy" and "You." The Normal Guy said "Get your life
>>> jacket and jump!" You said "What about the sheep?" The smarter one
>>> said "*** the sheep!" You said "All of them?" and ended up going
>>> down with the sheep.
>>>
>>> I'm waiting for your refutation. Stop fucking around with that
>>> mindless bull*** about the 757 that crashed at the Pentagon. It has
>>> been thoroughly and universally dismissed and its amusement value has
>>> diminished to near zero, so get your dumb ass busy and debunk the
>>> sheepshipping story. DO IT NOW.
>>
>> You certainly make a lot of posts about something universally
>> dismissed.
>
> Now you're getting it. That's exactly what I've done, although it's funny
> that yesterday you were bitching about me not replying to each of your
> idiotic little tantrums.
>
> Why are you afraid to try to debunk the sheep story, bimbo?
>
> < ASCE Report Proves to fucking idiots No 757 Hit The Pentagon
>> http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
>>
> < No 757 Hit The Pentagon, according to *** Eastman, one of the dumbest
>> and most clueless sumbitches in Washington
>> http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>>
> < New Online Video "Proves" to the brain dead that No 757 Hit The
>>Pentagon
>> http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
>
> Featherbrain, I have some good news for you. You can find the definition
> of "prove" in a dictionary. I hope you're excited about this revelation,
> knowing that you have some chance now of learning what it means.
>
> By the way, it's pretty funny that you don't have even a vague clue about
> where you'd go with the horse*** you're spewing if it were true.
> Obviously it doesn't matter what your next step would be, since 100% of
> the evidence says the missing 757 crashed at the Pentagon. I'm only
> asking because I see that your attempt to answer would be amusing.
Since 100% of the evidence supports a 757, I guess we have nothing to
discuss, do we?
ASCE Report Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
New Online Video Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
-- http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more Gortician's Not Dead, Punk http://www.metal-archives.com/release.php?id=15537 Gortician - "Purple Haze" cover http://www.audiostreet.net/artists/000/640/gortician.html
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B)"
- Previous message: Brian Voth For President: "Re: 757 Rips Antenna Off Of Jeep Cherokee!"
- In reply to: John Griffin: "Re: Another Scholarly Refutation of the Pentagon Fraud"
- Next in thread: John Griffin: "Re: 100% of the evidence supports a 757 at the Pentagon."
- Reply: John Griffin: "Re: 100% of the evidence supports a 757 at the Pentagon."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]