Re: Pentagon Conspiracy Debunked

From: First_Blood (First_Blood_at_exposed.net)
Date: 10/25/04 

Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:10:13 GMT

"1aircraftQAguy" <glennab1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:a83bb3a1.0410242037.6c15bf4c@posting.google.com...
> "Still-Existing German Nazi Psychiatry Mindcontroller" <master@mason.snuh>
wrote in message news:<Xns958C889226EB4spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in
> > news:633b063b.0410240240.4a5b6a2d@posting.google.com:
> >
> > > Brian Voth For President <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > > news:<Xns958B7CD9D86CBspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > >> lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in
> > >> news:633b063b.0410230221.57a42d5d@posting.google.com:
> > >>
> > >> > Brian Voth For President <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > >> > news:<Xns958A9F119C14Aspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > >> >> lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in
> > >> >> news:633b063b.0410221057.7c05f2f6@posting.google.com:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii <master@mason.snuh> wrote in
> > >> >> > message
news:<Xns95848D631FDFBspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > >> >> >> "Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in
> > >> >> >> news:Va2cd.149182$nA6.124692 @twister.rdc-kc.rr.com:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > Nope, it would have the effects found at the
> > >> >> >> > Pentagon on September 11, because the 757 really
> > >> >> >> > did hit it.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> You can't argue with circular logic.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Well, you can, but it gets tiresome.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> ASCE Report Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
> > >> >> >> http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon/asce
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> No 757 Hit The Pentagon
> > >> >> >> http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> New Online Video Proves No 757 Hit The Pentagon
> > >> >> >> http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > What about this link;
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > which shows exactly the other opinion. I notice you've never
> > >> >> > discussed what's been provided here.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Actually, idiot, I answered that thread, on that board, and in
this
> > >> >> newsgroup.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I raised, oh, 25 or so questions that have yet to be addressed.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But you're too much of a fucking numbskull to realize that, I
guess.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's always so plesent, reading your posts. Seriously, I didn't see
> > >> > your post on that board.
> > >>
> > >> Open your fucking eyes, Jerky.
> > >>
> > >> > All I ever see is you mindlessly insulting
> > >> > people here and waving the "no 757" links as if they were magic
> > >> > talismans.
> > >>
> > >> Pity you can't debunk them, eh?
> > >
> > > They've been debunked by people who know better than I do. (And they
> > > managed it without needless insults.)
> >
> > Surely you have a cite or a link to prove your claim. Right?
> >
>
> It's been debunked right here, you just keep up the facade!
>
> The 757 shape matches the aircraft silhouette in security video.

Matches? Eliminates?
> The 757 wingspan matches the damage to the Penatgon exterior.

Matches? Eliminates?

> The Pentagon's main hole diameter matches the 757 fuselage diameter.

Matches? Eliminates?

> The aircraft parts in the Pentagon rubble have been verified by an
> expert (and others on websites) to be 757 parts, you questioned his
> qualifications, he provided a link to verify qualifications.

Bull, unnamed expert. Expert for whom, the US Gubmint?

> The metal spools that supposedly were missed by the "757" were
> obviously hit and damaged.
> etc., etc., etc.

Hit by a blast and damaged, NOT plowed into by a 757.

Quantcast