Re: How can rigid bodies exist?
From: Jack Martinelli (jack_at_martinelli.org)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: RP: "Re: A New Definition for TIME"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock"
- In reply to: Erland Gadde: "How can rigid bodies exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:46:21 GMT
"Erland Gadde" <erland@bredband.net> wrote in message
news:c114637b.0410260358.1a554c5b@posting.google.com...
> Few things seem so self evident for us in our everyday's life as rigid
> bodies.
The word "rigid" is context sensitive. If you can find a _reference length_
that is static with respect to some other length of interest you can say
that it is rigid with respect to the reference length.
see: http://martinelli.org/rexpansion/ for more detail.
Regards
Jack Martinelli
- Next message: RP: "Re: A New Definition for TIME"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock"
- In reply to: Erland Gadde: "How can rigid bodies exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
