Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time
From: Morituri-Max (newage_at_sendarico.net)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax?"
- Previous message: Michael Moroney: "Re: What if the higgs don't exist...."
- In reply to: Moby Dikc: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Reply: Mike Helland: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:28:27 GMT
Moby Dikc wrote:
> My claim is that "matter, like space and time, is relative."
So tell us what that statement helps you do to imrpove scientific knowledge..
what is the practical benefit? If it is as useful as another guy recently who
kept posting axioms which didn't result in any practical or theoretical use why
post it here? In point of fact, lefty finally realized that what he had, like
this statement of yours, was a whole lot of nothing but pretty sounding prose..
prose doesn't do anything useful in science.
So what can anyone in science do as a result of your earth-shattering claim?
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax?"
- Previous message: Michael Moroney: "Re: What if the higgs don't exist...."
- In reply to: Moby Dikc: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Reply: Mike Helland: "Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading