Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !
From: Rene Tschaggelar (none_at_none.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Previous message: Tom H.: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Torek: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Next in thread: habshi: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:21:47 +0200
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
> In article <41836fe6.2720311@news.clara.net>,
> habshi@anony.com (habshi) wrote:
>>.. Heating and cooling should
>>be from compulsory geothermal energy use
>
>
> So now I have to have a volcano in my back pocket? No thanks. I'll
> let the west coast keep them.
Actually, a borehole of 150m here can supply sufficient
heat to heat a family home together with a heatpump
operating at 300% efficiency. Meaning 25% of the heat
is going to be supplied by the heatpump itself and the
rest comes from the borehole at 6 downto 2 degrees of water
temperature. The borehole water is a closed circuit.
Rene
-- Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com & commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Previous message: Tom H.: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Torek: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Next in thread: habshi: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
