Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR
From: Myxococcus xanthus (mold-guardian_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: I need man love"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Arafat 'in critical condition'"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Oct 2004 18:50:48 -0700
"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message news:<vaugd.597$fN6.464@news.flashnewsgroups.com>...
> "Myxococcus xanthus" <mold-guardian@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:ce5e7813.0410281202.4491cdd6@posting.google.com...
> > Only a few
> > eclipsing binary stars have exhibited apparent discrepancies with GR,
>
> *ALL* of long-period eclipsing binaries show discrepancies,
I'll be very busy over the next week, so I can't immediately address
all the points you made in your rather extensive post, but your above
statement is totally false.
I found a counterexample without even working hard. The apsidal motion
of V1143 Cyg, with a period of 7.64d, is considered completely
consistent with GR.
http://aa.springer.de/papers/7327001/2300011/small.htm
Since you have previously shown yourself to be familiar with this
paper, I can only conclude that you had hoped to win this argument
with lies. Shame!
As I said, it will be a week or so before I can address your other
points.
Myxococcus xanthus
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: I need man love"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Arafat 'in critical condition'"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
