Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?

From: Mike (eleatis_at_yahoo.gr)
Date: 11/03/04 

Date: 3 Nov 2004 14:41:58 -0800

"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message news:<rN3id.9415$K7.5843@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...

[snip]
> >
> > Now, since you keep posting all these insane though experiments, tell
> > me what "accelerating at a constant velocity" means.
>
> Relative to an inertial frame.
>

You really need to read an introductory book on kinematics. There is
no such thing as "accelerating at a constant velocity and relative to
an inertial frame". Are you totally stupid or what?

> >
> > Tell me something: are you totally insane or what?
> >
>
> Relative to who - you?
>

There are several tests you can take at a doctor's office to determine
whether you are insane. Try one or two.

> >
> > If you cannot understand the question one poses, better not copy and
> > paste anything.
> >
>
> If you do not understand what you are asking about why post a question?
>

My qustions are clear to sane persons.
[snip]

> > This begs my question: what is a sufficiently small region and when it
> > ceases to be small?
>
> Read a book on calculus.
>

Listen idiot, we are not talking cclculus here, which by the way you
flunk big way, we are talking physics. Explain in a physical sense
what is a local region and when it ceases to be that.Stupid.

> >
> > Do you know the answer? If you don't, shut up.
> >
>
> Ever hear of an infinitesimal? - if not quit posting until you understand
> the basics. (1)

You are pathetic. Have you heard of hyperreal numbers, or better
non-standard analysis? Can you give a description of what an
infinitesimal is in a physical sense so I can tailor my measurements
around that? When you speak about experiments you must be able to
quantify the parameters.

>
>
> My opinion is whether you call yourself Mike or undeniable you are still an
> idiot with delusions of competence who mistakes philosophical ****ing for
> science.
>
> Bill

You got no answers, you are pathetic, you cannot quantify the terms
you are using to justify your ill thought experiments. You have no
clue about experiments or science whatsoever. You live in the dark
world of thought experiments, performed in a local region you don't
know how to define other than using the word infinitesimal you don't
even know what it means. Summary: you are stupid and a waist of time
to deal with. Watch stupid:

s = gt^2/2 (d is the delta)

s = s +ds, t = t+dt then : s+ds = g(t+dt)^2/2 = g(t^2+2tdt+dt^2)/2 =
gt^2/2+gtdt+gdt^2/2 = s+gtdt+gdt^2/2 Thus

ds/dt = gt+gdt/2

Now tell me stupid, are you going to let your infinitesimal dt go to
zero? if you do, stupid, s+ds = s and t+dt = t and you are not moving,
you are frozen still. Of course, for all stationary observers, the
speed of light is constant because they are not moving. By definition,
in all local measurements, c is constant. That says nothing when dt is
not 0. GR and SR universe is frozen still and only an idiot would
consider that physics. Now, playing games with terms like
instanteneous velocity does not change anything. You are trapped in
your own incompetence and stupidity, let alone your thought
experiments and infinitesmals you don't understand.

Are you going to keep lying to people about infinitesimals? Now that I
teach you, you know there is a problem. You do not understand it and
neither the math illiterate Einstein. So stop talking about
infinitesimal, shut up and go learn something to enlighten yourself.

Mike

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Einsteins Principle of Equivalence true?
    ... > Relative to an inertial frame. ... infinitesimal is in a physical sense so I can tailor my measurements ... you are stupid and a waist of time ... experiments and infinitesmals you don't understand. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is Einsteins Principle of Equivalence true?
    ... >> Relative to an inertial frame. ... > no such thing as "accelerating at a constant velocity and relative to ... Are you totally stupid or what? ... > experiments and infinitesmals you don't understand. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is Einsteins Principle of Equivalence true?
    ... >> Relative to an inertial frame. ... > no such thing as "accelerating at a constant velocity and relative to ... Are you totally stupid or what? ... > experiments and infinitesmals you don't understand. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)