Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark
From: Eugene Shubert (http://www.everythingimportant.org)
Date: 11/05/04
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!!"
- Previous message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!!"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:17:43 -0600
"Eugene Shubert" <http://www.everythingimportant.org> wrote in message
news:418bb7d8@sys13.hou.wt.net...
>
> Since I never questioned the empirical precision of SR, you're
> just responding like an unthinking parrot. Not only do you fail
> to understand that my dispute with Tom is about the nature of
> mathematical proof and the logical correctness of a very far-
> reaching metamathematical postulate
> http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf , you
> ignorantly supply abundant evidence that you are primarily a parrot.
>
> It's clear that http://www.edu-observatory.org is your website and
> in it, you mostly just parrot what others have written word for
> word. I am trying to be conservative but I think it's fair to say
> that you never had an original thought in your entire life!
>
> What other wholesale copying would you like to confess to through
> your website, in addition to the confessions already listed?
Since you are a pathological liar, and since these things are easy to
figure out, I'll tell you.
I see that SCIENTIFICAMERICAN.com claims ownership of this article:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0001AA37-92BA-1CD6-B4A8809EC588EEDF
and that page displays a copyright: © 1996-2004 Scientific American,
Inc. It reads as follows:
Stephen D. Landy - Even for most astronomers, a galaxy is a sizable
thing-a throng of hundreds of billions of stars, threaded with
gargantuan clouds of gas and dust, in a region hundreds of thousands
of light-years across. But for cosmologists, those who study nature on
its very largest scales, a galaxy is merely the basic unit of matter.
Billions of them fill the observable universe. They congregate into
clusters three million or more light-years across, which in turn
constitute progressively larger assemblages. On all scales observed
thus far by astronomers, galaxies appear to cluster and form intricate
structures-presumably through physical processes that were dominant
during the early expansion of the universe and later through
gravitational interactions.
You copied this and other intellectual property, including
pictures, and claim copyright: © Copyright 2003 - Samuel J.
Wormley - Educational Observatory Institute, Inc.
Note the detestable plagiarism and lack of proper attributions:
http://www.edu-observatory.org/eo/distances.html
http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/ask/a11026.html
Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!!"
- Previous message: Morituri-Max: "Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!!"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|