Re: Almost Everything is Expanding
From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 11/05/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Previous message: hanson: "Re: God help America"
- In reply to: Ray Tomes: "Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Next in thread: Ray Tomes: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Reply: Ray Tomes: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:51:44 -0700
Dear Ray Tomes:
"Ray Tomes" <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote in message
news:cmh305$jeu$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
...
> 1. Cosmological red shift = 1 / 13.7 billion years
> 2. Spacecraft anomolous accelerations = 1 / 12.1 billion years
> 3. Lunar movement = 1 / 10.1 billion years
> 4. Earth expansion = 1 / 4 billion years
This presentation is useless. Can you put this in units like the Hubble
parameter?
For example, the anomalous "expansion" between the Earth and the Moon, that
not accounted for by the actual recession of the Moon based on its period,
is a much lower value than the established "local" Hubble parameter. As if
expansion has slowed...
URL:http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0302/0302008.pdf
Oh, and by the way, the spacecraft anomalous accelerations were of opposite
sign to expansion, as if G was increased, or they had passed outside a
shell of (Dark) matter, (or more likely the mechanical defects identified
in each case had made itself known).
David A. Smith
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Previous message: hanson: "Re: God help America"
- In reply to: Ray Tomes: "Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Next in thread: Ray Tomes: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Reply: Ray Tomes: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|