Re: Basics series proposed

From: Jim Greenfield (greenfield_7_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/06/04


Date: 5 Nov 2004 23:50:21 -0800

fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message news:<fd0fc2fa.0411051408.510d667f@posting.google.com>...
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cmfl34$qnv$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > Jim Greenfield wrote:
> > > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cmd3ta$8el$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > >
> > >>Jim Greenfield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cma92o$bq2$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > >
> > >
> > > snip
> > >
> > >
> > >>For the fifth time: are the points moving right from the start, or are
> > >>they accelerated first? Despite your constant denials, that makes a
> > >>difference!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > And for about the fifteenth (in various forms), show where, in
> > > Lorentz, Fitzgerald, AE or anyone else you like to quote for the
> > > formulae "showing" length reduction along the line of travel, is
> > > ACELLERATION mentioned?
> >
> > And also for the fifth time: SR is only valid for *inertial* systems. As
> > soon there is acceleration, the calculations become *different*.
>
> What about constant acceleration?
>
> *wonders*
>
> So finding the components of acceleration in SR was just otherwise
> useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule?
>
> >
> >
> > Bye,
> > Bjoern

As for other: there was NO accelleration pertinent to these
calculations, either previous or present.

Jim G
c'=c+v



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... >>What about constant acceleration? ... >>useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... >>What about constant acceleration? ... >>useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... > What about constant acceleration? ... > useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... >> What about constant acceleration? ... >> useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule? ... What do you call a change of velocity? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... >> What about constant acceleration? ... >> useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule? ... What do you call a change of velocity? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)