Re: Boyancy and Gravity?
From: Philip Holman (namlohip_at_comcast.net)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Ian Stirling: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Previous message: Edward Green: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: Gremlin: "Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Next in thread: Gremlin: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Gremlin: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: John Morriss: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:18:49 -0800
"Gremlin" <virtualadepts.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95A16F3179664Test@216.168.3.44...
> The average atmospheric pressure at Earth's surface is about 14.6
> pounds
> per square inch, which is about 100,000 pascals.
>
> What would gravity on the earth be like without this air pressure,
> with 0
> pascals of air pressure? If you look at a helium balloon it obviously
> has
> mass, yes.. but it has no actual weight.. if you were to measure it on
> a
> scale. So obviously air pressure factors in to somethings weight. My
> question is how much would an average person weigh if it were not for
> air
> pressure? Or in general any discussion about the topic.
>
> Apparently the force of gravity keeps air around the earth. Perhaps
> though
> the air is just more dense than the near vacuum of space so it
> collects
> itself into on place. That is my theory, as what gravity actually
> is..
> Just an effect of buoyancy. No need to argue with me about it because
> I
> don't have any evidence to support my idea.. yet. Solids also collect
> themselves because of buoyancy in near vacuum and in air.. As does
> water
> etc. This is why a rock will sink in water, and water will sink in
> air..
> and helium will rise in air. Everything though will sink in the near
> vacuum of space though because buoyancy is caused by density and
> vacuum is
> the least dense of everything. It is just there is no 'down' for
> anything
> to sink in, in vacuum so everything just collects together and creates
> a
> down consistent with that collection of matter.
>
> What do you think!?
Archimedes principle.....upthrust on a body is equal to the weight of
fluid displaced. Air is .076 lbs/cu ft so a person (say 6 cu ft) would
weigh ~1/2lb less in a vacuum. Hardly a plan for weight watchers.
PH
- Next message: Ian Stirling: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Previous message: Edward Green: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: Gremlin: "Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Next in thread: Gremlin: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Gremlin: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: John Morriss: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|