Re: Boyancy and Gravity?
From: Gremlin (virtualadepts_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Bruce Sinclair: "Re: PV costs"
- Previous message: Roland Paterson-Jones: "Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins"
- In reply to: Philip Holman: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Philip Holman: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Greg Neill: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:31:04 -0000
"Philip Holman" <namlohip@comcast.net> wrote in news:j6KdnXGiif0KPArcRVn-
tw@comcast.com:
>
> "Gremlin" <virtualadepts.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns95A16F3179664Test@216.168.3.44...
>> The average atmospheric pressure at Earth's surface is about 14.6
>> pounds
>> per square inch, which is about 100,000 pascals.
>>
>> What would gravity on the earth be like without this air pressure,
>> with 0
>> pascals of air pressure? If you look at a helium balloon it obviously
>> has
>> mass, yes.. but it has no actual weight.. if you were to measure it on
>> a
>> scale. So obviously air pressure factors in to somethings weight. My
>> question is how much would an average person weigh if it were not for
>> air
>> pressure? Or in general any discussion about the topic.
>>
>> Apparently the force of gravity keeps air around the earth. Perhaps
>> though
>> the air is just more dense than the near vacuum of space so it
>> collects
>> itself into on place. That is my theory, as what gravity actually
>> is..
>> Just an effect of buoyancy. No need to argue with me about it because
>> I
>> don't have any evidence to support my idea.. yet. Solids also collect
>> themselves because of buoyancy in near vacuum and in air.. As does
>> water
>> etc. This is why a rock will sink in water, and water will sink in
>> air..
>> and helium will rise in air. Everything though will sink in the near
>> vacuum of space though because buoyancy is caused by density and
>> vacuum is
>> the least dense of everything. It is just there is no 'down' for
>> anything
>> to sink in, in vacuum so everything just collects together and creates
>> a
>> down consistent with that collection of matter.
>>
>> What do you think!?
>
> Archimedes principle.....upthrust on a body is equal to the weight of
> fluid displaced. Air is .076 lbs/cu ft so a person (say 6 cu ft) would
> weigh ~1/2lb less in a vacuum. Hardly a plan for weight watchers.
>
> PH
>
>
Hrm... aren't you forgetting that the average atmospheric pressure at
Earth's surface is about 14.6 pounds per square inch?
Sounds to me that without the air we would be 14.6 pounds per square inch
lighter!
- Next message: Bruce Sinclair: "Re: PV costs"
- Previous message: Roland Paterson-Jones: "Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins"
- In reply to: Philip Holman: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Philip Holman: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Greg Neill: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Boyancy and Gravity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|