Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: David Macmanus: "Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Garbi: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Next in thread: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Reply: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Reply: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:19:25 GMT
Garbi wrote:
> Sam,
>
> Do you not understand the laws of thermodynamics? GravityMechanic2's
> assumption is pretty accurate according to this law when you consider the
> Universe as single system (which it is). Thus, the total energy of the
> Universe may fluctuate in different regions, but the energy is always
> conserved. And if it is always conserved, then it is a constant.
>
Is Energy Conserved in General Relativity?
http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
- Next message: David Macmanus: "Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Garbi: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Next in thread: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Reply: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Reply: GRAVITYMECHANIC2: "Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|