Re: Alchemy
From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore: "Re: Fabreze is full of ***"
- Previous message: ravadongon: "EXAM COMING UP: NEED HELP WITH VECTORS"
- In reply to: Gremlin: "Alchemy"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Alchemy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Nov 2004 05:28:03 -0800
Gremlin <virtualadepts.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns95A4E263F3664Test@216.168.3.44>...
[snip]
> So much of modern science has been based in old philisophical ideas like
> these ones above, and so often other cultures have arived at the same
> conclusions are scientists have. Why don't these alternative views get the
> credit they deserve!?
What use would it serve to teach ancient outdated ideas that are not
correct outside a historical context?
>
> From your Pal,
> Gremlin
Grr google.
3rd try! "Sorry, a system error has occurred. Our engineers have been
notified."
- Next message: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore: "Re: Fabreze is full of ***"
- Previous message: ravadongon: "EXAM COMING UP: NEED HELP WITH VECTORS"
- In reply to: Gremlin: "Alchemy"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Alchemy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]