Re: Basics series proposed

From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 11/18/04 

Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:30:13 GMT

On 17 Nov 2004 13:20:46 -0800, jowr.pi@gmail.com (Eric Gisse) wrote:

>greenfield_7@hotmail.com (Jim Greenfield) wrote in message news:<3c4afb26.0411170036.67ec79d@posting.google.com>...
>> fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message news:<fd0fc2fa.0411141228.635d878c@posting.google.com>...
>> > greenfield_7@hotmail.com (Jim Greenfield) wrote in message news:<3c4afb26.0411132202.4ddc7245@posting.google.com>...
>> > [snip]
>> >
>> >>
>> > If you think we are religious you should leave. If you knew anything
>> > about religious people, you would realise that arguing with them will
>> > change nothing because religion is taken on faith and not evidence -
>> > and no amount of arguing can change that. Even though you have blinded
>> > yourself to scientific evidence, I hope you aren't blind to simple
>> > logic.
>> >
>> > Do you go to religious groups and shit on the people there because you
>> > disagree, just like you do here?
>>
>> If they couldn't explain how light from two sources can hit a receptor
>> moving from one to the other at the SAME velocity, and this was the
>> very basis of their creed, then I might.
>> So consider yourself shat on!
>>
>> Jim G
>> c'=c+v
>> PS: don't cry
>
>I notice two things.
>
>First, the mental block. You still can't comprehend that experimental
>evidence supports SR.

Geese, NO evidence supports SR.
The only thing that supports it is your FAITH!

>Even though SR reduces to Newtonian kinematics
>at the v << c limit, which corrosponds to daily life.
>
>Second, the "don't cry" phrase. This is something I expect to, and
>often do, see in online games. Insults that "work" in starcraft do not
>work in here.

What Jim said is true. SR is a circularly logical exercise.

A theory based on the assumption that OWLS is always measured as c
will...surprise, surprise....show that OWLS always equals c!

Now that's what I call REAL Nobel prize stuff...!

HW.

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... >> moving from one to the other at the SAME velocity, ... Geese, NO evidence supports SR. ... What Jim said is true. ... A theory based on the assumption that OWLS is always measured as c ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Conventional Evasiveness
    ... I wonder how many of the 9 specific direct questions that I put to Jim ... Why does is matter if you don't dispute it. ... interpretation of the evidence. ... So do you consider the change from Pan / Australopith LCA to A'pith to ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: What is the Aquatic theory?
    ... How could that be, Jim? ... why are you still using as evidence features found ... >> moving through water is going to have some effect isn't it? ... > Here the assumption is that scientists didn't take a look at it; ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Conventional Evasiveness
    ... I wonder how many of the 9 specific direct questions that I put to Jim ... interpretation of the evidence. ... So do you consider the change from Pan / Australopith LCA to A'pith to ... changes took place in the line from that LCA to chimps & ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Atheists are the biggest fools on Earth
    ... And a Supreme Being is needed. ... If morality is simply a human construct, ... [I've tried talking to you about morality previously, Jim. ... evidence of understanding what I was saying. ...
    (talk.origins)