Re: Time is a Property of Matter?
From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Jack Love: "Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph"
- Previous message: Kevin Brooks: "Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph"
- In reply to: Garbi: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Nov 2004 11:37:57 -0800
"Garbi" <jeremyh@bdssc.com> wrote in message news:<419d32f2$1_1@127.0.0.1>...
> As soon as someone mentions "dark matter", I instantly have to discredit
> just about everything they say.
That must keep you very busy, as it seems to be the hottest topic
around besides "frame-dragging". However, I cannot find any
discreditation in any part of your post other than what you believe.
>
> C'mon folks, let's think about what we already know. All the pieces are
> already there. Spacetime doesn't have to be such a mystery.
Yes, it does, because anything supernatural is mysterious, and s-t is
a fantasy stemming from the invention of a math tool which many
apparently have come to believe the basis of the imaginary tool is
real! That puts s-t into the realm of Theoretical Physics where
imagination roams free of any logical constraints.
> Science is
> about logic and observation. Use logic to put together what we have been
> observing for mellinia.
>
> Part of what you said is right. I don't believe there IS any such thing as
> completely empty space or there simply wouldn't be space. Not because of
> dark matter, but because of energy. Substitute in energy for all your
> concepts of "dark matter" and see what happens. . .
>
Talk is cheap; doing is hard. You cannot substitute energy for matter
unless you overthrow E=mc^2 which declares interdependence of mass and
energy, and that means you cannot have one without the other, thus,
one cannot be substituted for the other. You said, "use logic....".
> Some, God has gifted with math. Some, God has gifted with insight.
Others, God has gifted with sorrow; others, with poor logic.
>
> (BTW: I know the answers to WHY magnets work, WHY light seems to have a
> dual nature, WHY gravity seems to be the only force in the Universe that
> pulls instead of pushes, and WHY/HOW the seemingly unexplainable faster than
> light communication of quantum particles at a distance is possible. (And,
> NO, the answers to the questions are not "Because God wills it to be." But
> it does take quite a lot of effort to explain EVERYTHING.)
>
> Jeremy
>
>
As the saying goes, Jeremy, talk is cheap. If you want to convince
others of what you believe, you will have to posit your arguments for
them to review. Just saying it don't make it so.
TomGee 111904
- Next message: Jack Love: "Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph"
- Previous message: Kevin Brooks: "Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph"
- In reply to: Garbi: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
