Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?
From: Rushtown (rushtown_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: mountain man: "Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply)"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?"
- Next in thread: peeps: "Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Nov 2004 23:21:10 GMT
>Subject: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?
>From: usenet@mantra.com (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
>Date: 11/19/2004 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <8Z22dS080@k9RBKHv1>
>
>HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?
>
>Forwarded message from moderator@portside.org
>http://www.portside.org
>
>[ Subject: Has a runaway greenhouse effect begun?
>[ From: moderator@portside.org
>[ Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004
>
>Has a ‘runaway’ greenhouse effect begun?
Yes, as more ice melts there will be less white ice reflecting heat back into
space. The heating of the earth will accellerate.
But when all the ice is gone things will stabilize. There will be more CO2 and
so more green plants. The Green plants will contribute more 02, but maybe more
03 too.
- Next message: mountain man: "Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply)"
- Previous message: J.E.: "Re: SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?"
- Next in thread: peeps: "Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
