Re: SR consistency is crap.

From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/20/04 

Date: 20 Nov 2004 02:57:43 -0800

"eleaticus" <eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:<Bsvnd.37917$IQ.21441@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
> "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:929ed0f8.0411191352.598802cb@posting.google.com...
> > "eleaticus" <eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:<FBjnd.33999$z3.12491@bignews5.bellsouth.net>...
>
> > > Reliance on the concept of mathematical consistency is nonsense.
>
> > > Just consider the inconsistency as to which of two identically
> manufactured
> > > and maintained objects is shorter/longer when in relative motion.
> "You're
> > > shorter!" "No! YOU are!" "Wrong, ***, I can clearly see you are much
> > > shorter than me!" "Idiot! Are you insane?!" etc. No inconsistency there?
> > > LOL. You assholes!
> .
> > > Just consider the inconsistency of deriving spatial coordinate
> > > transformations and not being able to actually use them with EM
> quantities
> > > like E,B, D, H, etc. Or having to 'cook the books' when you actually do
> try
> > > to apply them to an equation.
>
> > > eleaticus
>
>
> > Tell us, eleaticus. Since you have "disproven" SR and calculus by your
> > stunning arguments against SR and limits, what is left of modern
> > physics that you don't feel like destroying?
>
> Another of the strawman arguments typical of True Believer SR-cult cretins.
>
> I have no problems with, nor even hinted or mistakenly implied problems
> with, caluclus and limits. I just pointed out that a physical process is a
> physical process that occurs over time and that formulae that are not
> process cannot argue against the results of a process argument. They can
> only show what some value -WOULD BE. In the Zeno Stadium case, what the
> given distance would be, which is quite a triumph: the distance it would be
> is the distance specified that it would be! WOW!

If you have no problem with limits why were you arguing about how wrong they are?

It is a simple problem to solve using limits but you failed to understand.

>
> It is lucky that you cretins aren't even one percent as hot as you think you
> are, else you'd burn yourselves to death with all the strawmen with which
> you surround yourselves.
>
> eleaticus

Quantcast