sci.physics
By Thread

5241 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 10/30/04
Ending: 11/21/04

• Storing the summer heat habshi (11/21/04)
  • Re: Storing the summer heat robert j. kolker (11/21/04)
  • Re: Storing the summer heat Chumly (11/21/04)
  • Re: Storing the summer heat The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
• Good news for causality (Speed of Light) Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/20/04)
• Confirmed: information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: Confirmed: information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/21/04)
• Please help me figure out what I'm doing wrong Snis Pilbor (11/20/04)
  • Re: Please help me figure out what I'm doing wrong ahmed6_at_gmail.com (11/21/04)
  • Re: Please help me figure out what I'm doing wrong Philip Holman (11/21/04)
• Paleomagnetism, Sea Floor Spreading Video Sean (11/20/04)
• The Brilliance of Our Teachers Etaercq (11/20/04)
  • Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers Uncle Al (11/20/04)
• Vintage Spinning Tops book Rare 1890 FA Sarah M. (11/20/04)
• Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Jeff_Relf (11/20/04)
  • Re: Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Rick (11/20/04)
    • Re: Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Jeff_Relf (11/20/04)
      • Re: Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Rick (11/20/04)
  • Re: Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Eric Gisse (11/21/04)
    • Re: Ben Goodger knows that, Linus knows that... how about you ? Hamilcar Barca (11/21/04)
• Newtons 3rd law ??? Udayan (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? Martin Johansen (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
  • Look you can plot the vectors and see what are the exact maverick88 (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? Jon Bell (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? Richard Tobin (11/20/04)
  • Re: Newtons 3rd law ??? robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• E-Publishing for Free! YOU do the work... Daniel Joseph Min (11/20/04)
  • Re: E-Publishing for Free! YOU do the work... Laura (11/20/04)
  • Re: E-Publishing for Free! YOU do the work... TomGee (11/21/04)
• Adaptive cruise control can help smooth out traffic flow Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• On Jan. 14, a space probe will plunge through the thick atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: On Jan. 14, a space probe will plunge through the thick atmosphereof Saturn's moon Titan Uncle Al (11/20/04)
• Light Falls . Mitchell (11/20/04)
  • Re: Light Falls . Uncle Al (11/20/04)
• Locality Martin Johansen (11/20/04)
• Light ben ito (11/20/04)
  • Re: Light Uncle Al (11/20/04)
    • Re: Light Rushtown (11/20/04)
      • Re: Light Morituri-Max (11/20/04)
  • Re: Light FrediFizzx (11/20/04)
  • Re: Light Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: Light tj Frazir (11/21/04)
• Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
  • Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox Uncle Al (11/20/04)
    • Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Double slit experiment explained. Rushtown (11/20/04)
  • Re: Double slit experiment explained. Uncle Al (11/20/04)
    • Re: Double slit experiment explained. Rushtown (11/20/04)
  • Re: Double slit experiment explained. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/19/04)
  • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Rushtown (11/19/04)
  • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? peeps (11/19/04)
    • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Rushtown (11/19/04)
  • green house ben ito (11/20/04)
    • Re: green house Morituri-Max (11/20/04)
  • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Ian St. John (11/20/04)
  • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Alan McIntire (11/20/04)
    • Re: HAS A RUNAWAY GREENHOUSE EFFECT BEGUN? Ian St. John (11/20/04)
• Pomping Eugeniusz (11/19/04)
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 04 Washington, DC Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 04 Washington, DC Jack Martinelli (11/19/04)
    • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 04 Washington, DC Jack Martinelli (11/19/04)
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 04 Washington, DC Maleki (11/20/04)
• The New Science Gremlin (11/19/04)
  • Re: The New Science Uncle Al (11/19/04)
    • Re: The New Science robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: The New Science Uncle Al (11/19/04)
      • Re: The New Science robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: The New Science Mike Helland (11/19/04)
      • Re: The New Science robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: The New Science Gremlin (11/20/04)
      • Re: The New Science robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: The New Science Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: The New Science Greg Neill (11/20/04)
    • Re: The New Science Gremlin (11/19/04)
  • Re: The New Science tj Frazir (11/20/04)
• Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Boris Mohar (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Evgenij Barsukov (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! MP (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Androcles (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! jahn (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Me (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Chris Oakley (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
• Raman Spectra Si3N4 Marlene (11/19/04)
  • re:Raman Spectra Si3N4 DAH (11/19/04)
• The Right Angle Lever Paradox Levelrq (11/19/04)
  • Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
• double slit diffraction and parallel universes? RolandRB (11/19/04)
  • Re: double slit diffraction and parallel universes? Uncle Al (11/19/04)
    • Re: double slit diffraction and parallel universes? Rushtown (11/20/04)
• general physics slickn_sly (11/19/04)
  • Re: general physics Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
    • Re: general physics tj Frazir (11/21/04)
  • re:general physics slickn_sly (11/19/04)
    • Re: general physics Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
      • Re: general physics tj Frazir (11/21/04)
    • Re: general physics puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/19/04)
  • Re: general physics Philip Holman (11/19/04)
  • Re: general physics Mike Helland (11/19/04)
  • Re: general physics Mike Helland (11/19/04)
  • Re: general physics channel_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
    • Re: general physics tj Frazir (11/21/04)
• Re: Question Bob Cain (11/19/04)
• Theory of swimming Vijayakumar (11/19/04)
  • Re: Theory of swimming Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
  • Re: Theory of swimming John T Lowry (11/19/04)
  • Re: Theory of swimming Uncle Al (11/19/04)
• Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Bunn E. Rabbit (11/19/04)
  • Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Dr. Flonkenstein (11/19/04)
  • Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Art Deco (11/20/04)
• What problem does relativity solve? Mike Helland (11/19/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mark Martin (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Helmut Wabnig (11/19/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mike Helland (11/19/04)
      • Re: What problem does relativity solve? kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: What problem does relativity solve? robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mike Helland (11/19/04)
      • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mike (11/20/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Bob Cain (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? tj Frazir (11/20/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Gregory L. Hansen (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Uncle Al (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mike Helland (11/19/04)
    • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Mike Helland (11/20/04)
      • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
  • Re: What problem does relativity solve? Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• maxwell's demon refrigerator Seth (11/19/04)
  • Re: maxwell's demon refrigerator Uncle Al (11/19/04)
• How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Hans-Marc Olsen (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Greg Neill (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Mark Martin (11/19/04)
    • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Morituri-Max (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Dude (11/19/04)
  • Re: How to create a supernova on Earth ? ? ? ? Joe Cummings (11/20/04)
• Magnetic Bubble Could Protect Astronauts on Long Trips Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/19/04)
  • Re: Magnetic Bubble Could Protect Astronauts on Long Trips Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • CHUCKWOOD PARADIGM APPLICATION Deepchak BooBoo (11/20/04)
• Help ID this cover illustration: Distribution of single electron, early 90's Paul Ciszek (11/19/04)
  • Re: Help ID this cover illustration: Distribution of single electron, early 90's Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
  • Re: Help ID this cover illustration: Distribution of single electron, early 90's puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/19/04)
  • Re: Help ID this cover illustration: Distribution of single electron, early 90's John Sefton (11/20/04)
  • Re: Help ID this cover illustration: Distribution of single electron, early 90's Mel Lep (11/20/04)
• asked students to name two vertical forces acting on a ball, hit straight up Don McDonald (11/19/04)
  • Re: asked students to name two vertical forces acting on a ball, hit straight up NOSPAM_at_NOSPAM.invalid.com (11/19/04)
• Exam Coming Up: Need Help With Vectors ravadongon (11/19/04)
  • Re: Exam Coming Up: Need Help With Vectors Dude (11/19/04)
• Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/18/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Peter Duniho (11/18/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. tj Frazir (11/21/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. partners_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
• Anyone know something about this problem? Adi Anant (11/18/04)
  • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
    • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/18/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/19/04)
  • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Robert Israel (11/19/04)
    • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/19/04)
    • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Peter Webb (11/19/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Robert Israel (11/19/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Peter Webb (11/20/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? Robert B. Israel (11/21/04)
      • Re: Anyone know something about this problem? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/20/04)
• I'm interested in Quantum Physics quietmakesnoise (11/18/04)
  • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
  • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
  • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics Dude (11/19/04)
    • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/19/04)
      • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics zigoteau (11/20/04)
      • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics George Jones (11/20/04)
      • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/21/04)
  • re:I'm interested in Quantum Physics tigertina (11/19/04)
  • Re: I'm interested in Quantum Physics zigoteau (11/20/04)
• Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/18/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/18/04)
    • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/19/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/20/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon Maleki (11/20/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon tj Frazir (11/20/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/18/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon richard miller (11/18/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon Pierre Le Cranque (11/18/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/20/04)
    • Re: Terraforming the Moon jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/20/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/20/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/20/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon habshi (11/21/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/21/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon robert j. kolker (11/21/04)
      • Re: Terraforming the Moon Maleki (11/20/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon Rodney Kelp (11/20/04)
  • Re: Terraforming the Moon Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/21/04)
• How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Tahcrq (11/18/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Uncle Al (11/18/04)
    • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? tj Frazir (11/19/04)
      • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
      • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? tj Frazir (11/21/04)
      • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? tj Frazir (11/21/04)
• Are laws constant? Gremlin (11/18/04)
  • Re: Are laws constant? Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
    • Re: Are laws constant? Jack Martinelli (11/19/04)
  • Re: Are laws constant? Mark Martin (11/18/04)
    • Re: Are laws constant? BllFs6 (11/19/04)
• EXAM COMING UP: NEED HELP WITH VECTORS ravadongon (11/18/04)
  • Re: EXAM COMING UP: NEED HELP WITH VECTORS Philip Holman (11/18/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Titan Point (11/18/04)
• New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/18/04)
• THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/18/04)
  • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
  • QM ben ito (11/20/04)
    • Re: QM Uncle Al (11/20/04)
      • Re: QM William Creighton (11/20/04)
• Another physics problem by my teacher cyberdude (11/18/04)
  • Re: Another physics problem by my teacher Philip Holman (11/18/04)
  • Re: Another physics problem by my teacher puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/18/04)
  • Re: Another physics problem by my teacher Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
• REAL ALCHEMY in BIOLOGY REM460 (11/18/04)
  • Re: REAL ALCHEMY in BIOLOGY Uncle Al (11/18/04)
• Re: oak acorns Re: interesting observation on Honeylocust Archimedes Plutonium (11/18/04)
  • Re: oak acorns Re: interesting observation on Honeylocust Christopher Green (11/18/04)
• which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Algebryonic (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? tsmith (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
    • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Ken Muldrew (11/18/04)
      • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? chris h fleming (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/18/04)
  • Re: which mathematics for undergrad phys degree? Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Alchemy Gremlin (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy Repeating Rifle (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy jacques jedwab (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
    • Re: Alchemy Richard Schultz (11/18/04)
      • Re: Alchemy Morituri-Max (11/18/04)
      • Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
      • Re: Alchemy Androcles (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
• Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
  • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Uncle Al (11/18/04)
    • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Mark Fergerson (11/18/04)
  • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Todd A. Anderson (11/19/04)
    • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
      • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Todd A. Anderson (11/20/04)
      • Re: Neutrino oscillations are here to stay Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• antonym of dense David Bandel (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Brad D (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Sam Wormley (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Greg Neill (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense John T Lowry (11/18/04)
    • Re: antonym of dense Chergarj (11/18/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense David Bandel (11/18/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense Chergarj (11/19/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense Maleki (11/19/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense John Sefton (11/20/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense tadchem (11/20/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/20/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense tadchem (11/21/04)
      • Re: antonym of dense Chergarj (11/21/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Patrick Powers (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
  • Re: antonym of dense Maleki (11/19/04)
• Scramjet could pioneer cheaper, safer, faster flights Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/17/04)
  • Re: Scramjet could pioneer cheaper, safer, faster flights Uncle Al (11/18/04)
• 'electron -electron repulsion' is questionable : New findings: Anantham (11/17/04)
  • Re: 'electron -electron repulsion' is questionable : New findings: Uncle Al (11/18/04)
• Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) greywolf42 (11/17/04)
  • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) Martin Hogbin (11/17/04)
    • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) mountain man (11/18/04)
      • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/18/04)
      • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) mountain man (11/19/04)
  • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/18/04)
  • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
    • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) greywolf42 (11/18/04)
  • Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (banned reply) Aleksandr Timofeev (11/18/04)
• Heat death and random walks none (11/17/04)
• Democrats lost *WAY* more than the election... Anonymous (11/17/04)
  • Re: Democrats lost *WAY* more than the election... Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/18/04)
    • Re: Democrats lost *WAY* more than the election... Tom McDonald (11/19/04)
    • Re: Democrats lost *WAY* more than the election... zolota (11/19/04)
• Re: FBI SADISTS should be HUNTED, KIDNAPPED and TORTURED for 3 YRS Dude 3 (11/17/04)
• 2nd Law - PW Atkins o (11/17/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 709 November 17, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
• The Paradox of Zeno Derisedq (11/17/04)
• THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/17/04)
  • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
    • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS Garbi (11/17/04)
      • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
      • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/17/04)
      • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/17/04)
  • Re: THE NEW QUANTUM MECHANICS tj Frazir (11/18/04)
• What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? bobblue (11/17/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? John T Lowry (11/17/04)
    • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? tj Frazir (11/17/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? Andy Resnick (11/17/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? bobblue (11/18/04)
  • Re: What musical instrument produces a triangle waveform? Patrick Powers (11/18/04)
• Re: Proof for the existence of telepathy (schizophrenia as neurosis) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/17/04)
  • Re: Proof for the existence of telepathy (schizophrenia as neurosis) Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
• Re: You see? My posts deleted... Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/17/04)
  • Re: You see? My posts deleted... Harry Conover (11/17/04)
• wheel rotation in opposite direction? Udayan (11/17/04)
  • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/17/04)
    • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
    • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? pete (11/20/04)
      • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Mark Martin (11/21/04)
• wheel rotation in opposite direction? udayan (11/17/04)
  • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Boris Mohar (11/17/04)
  • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Mark Martin (11/17/04)
    • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Udayan (11/20/04)
      • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Greg Neill (11/20/04)
      • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Mark Martin (11/21/04)
      • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Richard Henry (11/21/04)
      • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Richard Henry (11/21/04)
  • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: wheel rotation in opposite direction? John Morriss (11/18/04)
• American cigarettes for $ 14.95 ! Marlboro shopcig1 (11/17/04)
• Anti Freeze Noname (11/17/04)
  • Re: Anti Freeze Morituri-Max (11/17/04)
  • Re: Anti Freeze Mark Martin (11/17/04)
    • Re: Anti Freeze John T Lowry (11/17/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Mark Martin (11/17/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze John T Lowry (11/17/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze tj Frazir (11/19/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze tj Frazir (11/21/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze tj Frazir (11/21/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Greg Neill (11/18/04)
  • Re: Anti Freeze Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: Anti Freeze Ken Muldrew (11/17/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Boris Mohar (11/18/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Uncle Al (11/18/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Ken Muldrew (11/18/04)
      • Re: Anti Freeze Uncle Al (11/18/04)
• Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/17/04)
  • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation FrediFizzx (11/17/04)
    • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/17/04)
  • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
    • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/17/04)
  • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/17/04)
  • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Andr? Michaud (11/17/04)
    • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/18/04)
      • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Andr? Michaud (11/18/04)
      • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Eckard Blumschein (11/19/04)
      • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Andr? Michaud (11/19/04)
      • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
      • Re: Painful but inevitable resignation Andr? Michaud (11/20/04)
• NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Bunn E. Rabbit (11/17/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Mark Test (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Brian Allardice (11/17/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Thomas Schoene (11/17/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Andy Resnick (11/17/04)
• Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Benign Vanilla (11/17/04)
• Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Uncle Al (11/17/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Benign Vanilla (11/17/04)
    • tj frazir to recover NASA X-43A 'Scramjet' hanson (11/17/04)
      • Re: tj frazir not recover NASA X-43A 'Scramjet' tj Frazir (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph ZZBunker (11/20/04)
• Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Scott M. Kozel (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Brian Allardice (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Ramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Moderate Mammal (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Arved Sandstrom (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph raymond o'hara (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Linthicum (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph hanson (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Linthicum (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Kevin Brooks (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Brian Allardice (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Kevin Brooks (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Peter Skelton (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/19/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph DrPostman (11/20/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Linthicum (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Kevin Brooks (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph starlord (11/20/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Scott Ferrin (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Love (11/20/04)
• Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Double-A (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph raymond o'hara (11/18/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Mark Borgerson (11/18/04)
  • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'BUZZ BOMB' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/18/04)
      • Re: NASA 'BUZZ BOMB' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'ram scram' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph tj Frazir (11/18/04)
    • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Mike58 (11/20/04)
      • Re: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jack Linthicum (11/20/04)
• Democrats lost FAR more than the election . . . Anonymous (11/17/04)
• If the earth were a tennis ball Jay (11/17/04)
  • Re: If the earth were a tennis ball mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/17/04)
  • Re: If the earth were a tennis ball John Zinni (11/17/04)
  • Re: If the earth were a tennis ball puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/17/04)
    • Re: If the earth were a tennis ball George Jones (11/17/04)
  • Re: If the earth were a tennis ball Uncle Al (11/17/04)
• Equivalence principle passes atomic test Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: Equivalence principle passes atomic test Mike (11/17/04)
    • Re: Equivalence principle passes atomic test Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: Equivalence principle passes atomic test Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
  • Re: Equivalence principle passes atomic test Uncle Al (11/17/04)
• Gravitational force as a function of radius Cyde Weys (11/17/04)
  • Re: Gravitational force as a function of radius Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
  • Re: Gravitational force as a function of radius puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/17/04)
  • Re: Gravitational force as a function of radius John C. Polasek (11/17/04)
  • Re: Gravitational force as a function of radius Uncle Al (11/17/04)
• Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/16/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Marcus Wellpoth (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/17/04)
    • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Garbi (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/19/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? ZZBunker (11/17/04)
• Energy for weather on Jupiter John Smith (11/16/04)
  • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Uncle Al (11/17/04)
  • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
    • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter John Sefton (11/17/04)
      • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Uncle Al (11/17/04)
      • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
      • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/18/04)
      • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
      • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • re:Energy for weather on Jupiter DAH (11/17/04)
    • Re: Energy for weather on Jupiter Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
• Occult Energy Eugeniusz (11/16/04)
  • Re: Occult Energy Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Occult Energy Mike (11/17/04)
  • Re: Occult Energy Mike (11/17/04)
  • Re: Occult Energy Paul Cardinale (11/17/04)
• Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks habshi (11/16/04)
  • Re: Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  • Re: Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
    • Re: Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks habshi (11/17/04)
      • Re: Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/17/04)
  • Re: Renewable energy payback is better than interest fromha money in the banks Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
• solar panels for space flight/float? Pierre Le Cranque (11/16/04)
  • Re: solar panels for space flight/float? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
  • Re: solar panels for space flight/float? Mark Martin (11/17/04)
    • Re: solar panels for space flight/float? Observer (11/17/04)
• what is the unit of the Matlab 2D FFT output matrix? kiki (11/16/04)
  • Re: what is the unit of the Matlab 2D FFT output matrix? Armin Doerry (11/17/04)
  • Re: what is the unit of the Matlab 2D FFT output matrix? Mike Yarwood (11/17/04)
    • Re: what is the unit of the Matlab 2D FFT output matrix? Mike Yarwood (11/17/04)
• Re: NASA ScramJet Makes Rutan Look Like Piker The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
• Re: Downward spiral in enengy.... The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
• focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy heiko ackermann (11/16/04)
  • Re: focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy Chumly (11/16/04)
  • Re: focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
    • Re: focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy Ken Muldrew (11/17/04)
  • Re: focusing of sound waves mit low frequncy Harry Conover (11/17/04)
• energy required for membrane fusion Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
  • Re: energy required for membrane fusion Ken Muldrew (11/16/04)
• Persistence of Vision (o) (o) Jean (11/16/04)
  • Re: Persistence of Vision (o) (o) jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
  • Re: Persistence of Vision (o) (o) Jean (11/18/04)
    • Re: Persistence of Vision (o) (o) Richard Herring (11/19/04)
• An inverse of sphere enclosed by cylinder is cylinder wrapping Re: The construction of a tree saver Archimedes Plutonium (11/16/04)
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Desabwq (11/16/04)
  • Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
  • Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  • Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Dr. Photon (11/17/04)
• Britain gets superbroadband habshi (11/16/04)
  • Re: Britain gets superbroadband jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
    • Re: Britain gets superbroadband Codex Twin (11/16/04)
• Calculating intensity with potential measured by silicon light detectors Andrew Stallard (11/16/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 Morituri-Max (11/16/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 richard miller (11/16/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 tj Frazir (11/16/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 tj Frazir (11/16/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 16-Nov-2004 tj Frazir (11/16/04)
• Entropy is frame dependent. Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
  • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. Mike (11/16/04)
    • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. Jeff_Relf (11/19/04)
      • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. Edward Green (11/19/04)
      • Uncle Al Vs Jeff_Relf. Jeff_Relf (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al Vs Jeff_Relf. Uncle Al (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al Vs Jeff_Relf. Eric Gisse (11/21/04)
  • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. TomGee (11/19/04)
    • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. Jeff_Relf (11/20/04)
      • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. TomGee (11/21/04)
      • Re: Entropy is frame dependent. Hamilcar Barca (11/21/04)
• I keep writing to senators and some Gral Lamont... Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
• need help with a separable pde Mitchell Strum (11/16/04)
  • Re: need help with a separable pde Michael Jørgensen (11/16/04)
• Why *TEN* Commandments? Daniel Joseph Min (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? G.O.D. (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? JuanL (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Jacques Guy (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Eric Stevens (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Jacques Guy (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Eric Stevens (11/17/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? Mitch Alsup (11/16/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Androcles (11/17/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Titan Point (11/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Androcles (11/17/04)
• Conventional Fusion FAQ Section 0/11 (Intro) Part 1/3 (Overview) Robert F. Heeter (11/16/04)
• Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Anonymous (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Tom McDonald (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Morituri-Max (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` ad (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Tim Auton (11/16/04)
      • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` george c (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` moT (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` robert j. kolker (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` ZZBunker (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` DrPostman (11/16/04)
      • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` ZZBunker (11/17/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` John Ladasky (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Chris.B (11/17/04)
    • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Tom Potter (11/20/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` George (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` George (11/17/04)
• Why *TEN* Commandments? `` Nomen Nescio (11/16/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `` John Savard (11/16/04)
  • Re: How To Be HAPPY During Armageddon! Lorrill Buyens (11/17/04)
• Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Mark Fergerson (11/16/04)
  • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Mark Fergerson (11/16/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Quantum Mirror (11/16/04)
  • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Mark Fergerson (11/16/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Edward Green (11/17/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Edward Green (11/17/04)
  • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? Edward Green (11/17/04)
    • Re: Copenhagen and MWI laid to rest? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/17/04)
• Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Mr. Marcio Moraes (11/16/04)
  • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Boris Mohar (11/16/04)
    • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/16/04)
      • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Repeating Rifle (11/16/04)
      • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Helmut Wabnig (11/16/04)
  • Re: Thorium Oxide - Where could I buy small quantity? Harry Conover (11/17/04)
• Specific Heat Problem [HELP NEEDED] Texas Longhorns (11/15/04)
• Specific Heat Problem [HELP NEEDED] Texas Longhorns (11/15/04)
• Specific Heat Problem [HELP NEEDED] Texas Longhorns (11/15/04)
  • Re: Specific Heat Problem [HELP NEEDED] Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) Maleki (11/15/04)
  • Re: CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) Mark Fergerson (11/16/04)
    • Re: CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) Tom Potter (11/16/04)
    • Re: CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) tadchem (11/16/04)
      • Re: CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) Mark Fergerson (11/16/04)
      • Re: CIA top guys filing unemployment? :-) Maleki (11/16/04)
• Why *TEN* Commandments? `~ Daniel Joseph Min (11/15/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
  • Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? `~ Rodney Kelp (11/17/04)
• About electric energy Baby Elian (11/15/04)
  • Re: About electric energy Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
  • Re: About electric energy Eckard Blumschein (11/16/04)
• Math Calculator Chang Zhu (11/15/04)
• The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe Levartq (11/15/04)
  • Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
    • Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe mike3 (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
  • Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe Uncle Al (11/15/04)
• Try it, you'll like it. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
  • Re: Try it, you'll like it. Morituri-Max (11/15/04)
    • Re: Try it, you'll like it. Rick (11/15/04)
  • Re: Try it, you'll like it. Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
    • Re: Try it, you'll like it. Rick (11/15/04)
    • Re: Try it, you'll like it. Creighton Hogg (11/15/04)
    • You will pick option number one. Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
      • Re: You will pick option number one. Rick (11/16/04)
      • Re: You will pick option number one. Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
• Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/15/04)
  • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/15/04)
    • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/15/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier Morituri-Max (11/16/04)
  • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier The Ghost In The Machine (11/15/04)
    • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/15/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier Morituri-Max (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier Morituri-Max (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier Morituri-Max (11/17/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
  • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/17/04)
    • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/17/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/17/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier habshi (11/17/04)
      • Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/17/04)
• Dark Sh_t. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
• Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics David Rasmussen (11/15/04)
  • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
    • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics David Rasmussen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/15/04)
      • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics David Rasmussen (11/15/04)
  • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
    • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics Mark Martin (11/15/04)
  • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics John T Lowry (11/15/04)
    • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
  • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics FrediFizzx (11/16/04)
  • Re: Popular Books on Quantum Mechanics David Macmanus (11/17/04)
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 15, 2004 PhDs.org Webmaster (11/15/04)
• Quantum mechanics and operators cfgauss (11/15/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/15/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators zigoteau (11/15/04)
    • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Bob Cain (11/19/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators zigoteau (11/20/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Bob Cain (11/21/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Mark Martin (11/15/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Dead Parrot (11/15/04)
    • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators lunatic (11/17/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators John T Lowry (11/15/04)
    • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Edward Green (11/16/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Rene Tschaggelar (11/15/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Edward Green (11/16/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Gregory L. Hansen (11/18/04)
    • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Edward Green (11/19/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Edward Green (11/20/04)
      • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
  • QM ben ito (11/20/04)
    • Re: QM Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
    • Re: QM Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: QM William Creighton (11/20/04)
• Re: Our world is facing an entropy crises. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
  • Jeff Relf is facing a mid-Life Crisis John Bailo (11/15/04)
    • John's betting on a dead horse. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
    • Re: Jeff Relf is facing a mid-Life Crisis Mark Martin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Jeff Relf is facing a mid-Life Crisis John Bailo (11/15/04)
      • Re: Jeff Relf is facing a mid-Life Crisis Mark Martin (11/16/04)
      • Speaking of casting blame... Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
      • Re: Speaking of casting blame... Mark Martin (11/16/04)
  • Re: Our world is facing an entropy crises. spike1_at_freenet.co.uk (11/15/04)
    • The Answer to Life... the Universe... and Everything... Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Answer to Life... the Universe... and Everything... spike1_at_freenet.co.uk (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Answer to Life... the Universe... and Everything... chrisv (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Answer to Life... the Universe... and Everything... Rick (11/15/04)
• Time is Everywhere - No observer required Mitchell (11/15/04)
  • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
    • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required John Sefton (11/15/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
  • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Tom Potter (11/15/04)
    • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required JeremyH (11/15/04)
    • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Tom Potter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required JeremyH (11/16/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Tom Potter (11/20/04)
    • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Mitchell (11/16/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Tom Potter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required JeremyH (11/16/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required Tom Potter (11/21/04)
      • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required TomGee (11/16/04)
• Bouyancy and Density Andy (11/15/04)
• Bouyancy and Density Andy (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bouyancy and Density John Smith (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bouyancy and Density Mark Martin (11/15/04)
• Bouyancy and Density Andy (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bouyancy and Density Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bouyancy and Density John Smith (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bouyancy and Density Still Not Martin Stone (11/15/04)
• Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
  • Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
• Fingerprints in the sky explained by Qbeautif?= ul mathematics” Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
  • Re: Fingerprints in the sky explained by “beautif ul mathematics” Narasimham G.L. (11/15/04)
    • Re: Fingerprints in the sky explained by “beautif ul mathematics” Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
    • Re: Fingerprints in the sky explai ned by ?beautif ul mathematics? Joe Kauzlarich (11/15/04)
• HOW NOW BROWN COW? Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: HOW NOW BROWN COW? J.E./C.Y.Cripps (11/14/04)
    • Re: HOW NOW BROWN COW? Tom Potter (11/15/04)
      • Re: HOW NOW BROWN COW? The Ghost In The Machine (11/15/04)
• E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? raid517 (11/14/04)
  • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
  • re:E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? raid517 (11/14/04)
    • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
    • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
  • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Andr? Michaud (11/15/04)
  • re:E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? raid517 (11/15/04)
    • re:E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/15/04)
    • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Andr? Michaud (11/15/04)
  • re:E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? raid517 (11/15/04)
    • Re: re:E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Morituri-Max (11/15/04)
  • Re: E=MC^2 and Mass Energy Equivalence? Y.Porat (11/15/04)
• Electrodymanics questions 5: Scattering from a cylinder Erland Gadde (11/14/04)
  • Re: Electrodymanics questions 5: Scattering from a cylinder Yongtao Yang (11/14/04)
    • Re: Electrodymanics questions 5: Scattering from a cylinder Erland Gadde (11/17/04)
• QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/14/04)
  • Re: QUANTUM MECHANICS Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
• Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/14/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Greg Neill (11/14/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Philip Holman (11/14/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/14/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Uncle Al (11/14/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Philip Holman (11/14/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Philip Holman (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Philip Holman (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Steve (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Greg Neill (11/14/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? John Morriss (11/18/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Mark Martin (11/14/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? EL (11/15/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Gremlin (11/15/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Paul Cardinale (11/15/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/15/04)
      • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? FrankH (11/16/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity? tj Frazir (11/19/04)
• Re: Ho! Ho! HUMBUG!! B Gilmour (11/14/04)
  • Re: Ho! Ho! HUMBUG!! John Baker (11/16/04)
• Retic Postings and SPAM Nevesrq (11/14/04)
  • Re: Retic Postings and SPAM Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
• Making Swiss Cheese of the Evolutionists Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: Making Swiss Cheese of the Evolutionists Tommy (11/14/04)
  • Re: Making Swiss Cheese of the Evolutionists Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
• few shorts q Gary Redmond (11/14/04)
  • Re: few shorts q Greg Neill (11/14/04)
    • Re: few shorts q Gary Redmond (11/14/04)
      • Re: few shorts q Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
  • Re: few shorts q Peter Kupfer (11/20/04)
• PUTTING CRIME IN RHYME Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: PUTTING CRIME IN RHYME R Brown (11/15/04)
• Evolutionists Getting Away with MURDER Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: Evolutionists Getting Away with MURDER Steve Hayes (11/15/04)
• BRAINS IN COLLISION. Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: BRAINS IN COLLISION. Tommy (11/14/04)
  • Re: BRAINS IN COLLISION. Steve Hayes (11/15/04)
• THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. Ed Conrad (11/14/04)
  • Re: THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. Gregory L. Hansen (11/14/04)
  • Re: THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. XtremeHOHA_t-XTX!> (11/14/04)
  • Re: THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. Uncle Al (11/14/04)
  • THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. XtremeHOHA_[t\)XTX!> (11/18/04)
    • Re: THE EVOLUTIONISTS' PRAYER. Vince Z. (11/19/04)
• Eric the spastic. Jeff_Relf (11/14/04)
  • Re: Eric the spastic. Uncle Al (11/14/04)
  • Re: Eric the spastic. Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
    • Re: Eric the spastic. tj Frazir (11/15/04)
• Enjoy your misery. Jeff_Relf (11/14/04)
  • Re: Enjoy your misery. Rick (11/14/04)
    • Re: Enjoy your misery. Jeff_Relf (11/14/04)
      • Re: Enjoy your misery. Rick (11/14/04)
  • Re: Enjoy your misery. Mark Martin (11/14/04)
    • Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Jeff_Relf (11/14/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Rick (11/14/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Jeff_Relf (11/14/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Rick (11/14/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
      • Re: Relf can't back up claims Rick (11/15/04)
      • RFC 1036: The References header defines the thread. Jeff_Relf (11/15/04)
      • Re: RFC 1036: The References header defines the thread. Rick (11/15/04)
      • Take control of your life Rick. Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
      • Re: Take control of your life Rick. Rick (11/16/04)
      • Re: Take control of your life Rick. Mark Martin (11/16/04)
      • Re: RFC 1036: The References header defines the thread. Mark Martin (11/15/04)
      • Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Rick (11/16/04)
      • You lack the control that I display. Jeff_Relf (11/16/04)
      • Re: You lack the control that I display. Rick (11/16/04)
      • Re: You lack the control that I display. Mark Martin (11/16/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Mark Martin (11/16/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Jeff_Relf (11/18/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. John Bailo (11/18/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Jeff_Relf (11/18/04)
      • Re: Your U.S. congressman levied that tax on you. Rick (11/18/04)
      • Re: RFC 1036: The References header defines the thread. Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
      • Re: Relf can't back up claims puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/15/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. tj Frazir (11/14/04)
      • Re: Stop complaining and start taking control of Your life. Eric Gisse (11/14/04)
    • Re: Enjoy your misery. tj Frazir (11/14/04)
    • Re: Enjoy your misery. tj Frazir (11/14/04)
      • Re: Enjoy your misery. Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
  • Re: Enjoy your misery. Rick (11/14/04)
  • Re: Enjoy your misery. Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
• Is the teacher right? cyberdude (11/14/04)
  • Re: Is the teacher right? Martin Hogbin (11/14/04)
    • Re: Is the teacher right? cyberdude (11/14/04)
  • Re: Is the teacher right? Mark Martin (11/14/04)
  • Re: Is the teacher right? tj Frazir (11/15/04)
• Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy ZZBunker (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy EL (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Androcles (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Mike (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy David Evens (11/15/04)
• Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Morituri-Max (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Morituri-Max (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
• Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
• Strange Quark Matter mike3 (11/14/04)
  • Re: Strange Quark Matter Mark Fergerson (11/14/04)
  • Re: Strange Quark Matter Uncle Al (11/14/04)
    • Re: Strange Quark Matter The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
    • Re: Strange Quark Matter BllFs6 (11/15/04)
      • Re: Strange Quark Matter Mark Fergerson (11/15/04)
      • Re: Strange Quark Matter Uncle Al (11/15/04)
      • Re: Strange Quark Matter BllFs6 (11/17/04)
• Re: Schizophrenia and athletes Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/14/04)
  • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes Lady Chatterly (11/14/04)
    • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
  • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes O.Ryon Archer (11/14/04)
    • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/14/04)
      • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes Lady Chatterly (11/14/04)
      • Re: Schizophrenia and athletes The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Fabreze is full of shit O.Ryon Archer (11/14/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/15/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Lady Chatterly (11/15/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/15/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Lady Chatterly (11/15/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Lady Chatterly (11/16/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/17/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit O.Ryon Archer (11/18/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/18/04)
      • Re: Fabreze is full of shit O.Ryon Archer (11/19/04)
• Re: lightning rod question AC (11/13/04)
• nice video of precession John Sefton (11/13/04)
  • Re: nice video of precession Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: nice video of precession John Sefton (11/13/04)
    • Re: nice video of precession Uncle Al (11/14/04)
      • Re: nice video of precession John Sefton (11/14/04)
      • Re: nice video of precession The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: nice video of precession John Sefton (11/15/04)
• Re: OT| U.S. democracy in peril jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/13/04)
• Choke on THIS, Pseudos!! Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
  • Re: Choke on THIS, Pseudos!! Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: Choke on THIS, Pseudos!! hanson (11/13/04)
• Einsteins de Hass experiment Kraft (11/13/04)
  • Re: Einsteins de Hass experiment Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
  • re:Einsteins de Hass experiment Kraft (11/13/04)
  • Re: Einsteins de Hass experiment Andr? Michaud (11/13/04)
  • Re: Einsteins de Hass experiment Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
• Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Kraft (11/13/04)
  • Re: Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: Disintegration of of water atoms [task] The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
  • re:Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Kraft (11/14/04)
    • Re: Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Uncle Al (11/14/04)
    • Re: Disintegration of of water atoms [task] The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
  • re:Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Kraft (11/15/04)
  • re:Disintegration of of water atoms [task] Kraft (11/16/04)
• An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
  • An OPEN LETTER to Ed Conrad George Dishman (11/13/04)
    • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Ed Conrad Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
      • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Ed Conrad george (11/14/04)
  • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. Charles (11/13/04)
    • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. george (11/13/04)
  • Re: An OPEN LETTER to Larry King. Dave Hubert (11/14/04)
• FOUR little WORDS say a mouthful. Ed Conrad (11/13/04)
  • Re: FOUR little WORDS say a mouthful. Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: FOUR little WORDS say a mouthful. Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
• A Snapshot of a Photon Sknahdq (11/13/04)
  • Re: A Snapshot of a Photon Uncle Al (11/13/04)
• Time Jimmy (11/13/04)
  • Re: Time Boris Mohar (11/13/04)
  • Re: Time Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
  • Re: Time Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
  • Re: Time Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: Time Peter Kupfer (11/14/04)
    • Re: Time Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Time Mitchell (11/15/04)
    • Re: Time TomGee (11/14/04)
  • Re: Time Mitchell (11/15/04)
• Got an ISP and a newsreader. Jeff_Relf (11/13/04)
  • Re: Got an ISP and a newsreader. Peter Köhlmann (11/13/04)
• A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Bunn E. Rabbit (11/13/04)
  • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Steve Rush (11/13/04)
    • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Bunn E. Rabbit (11/14/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Ash Wyllie (11/14/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Lorrill Buyens (11/16/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! John Savard (11/16/04)
  • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! John M Price PhD (11/14/04)
    • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! ramiga (11/17/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! DrPostman (11/18/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Art Deco (11/18/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (11/18/04)
      • Re: A Normal Guest on Art Bell Discussing Time Travel Sat Nite! Moderate Mammal (11/18/04)
• Hall effect takes a spin Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
• The Iced Foot Effect Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
  • re:The Iced Foot Effect Kraft (11/13/04)
• First Light: Faint object may be youngest star detected Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
• Recommend text on general college chemistry Maleki (11/13/04)
  • Re: Recommend text on general college chemistry Bob (11/13/04)
    • Re: Recommend text on general college chemistry Maleki (11/14/04)
      • Re: Recommend text on general college chemistry Bob (11/14/04)
• Engineering Postdocs Gregory L. Hansen (11/13/04)
  • Re: Engineering Postdocs Timo Nieminen (11/15/04)
    • Re: Engineering Postdocs Gregory L. Hansen (11/15/04)
• Photon hits an atom Doodedski (11/13/04)
  • Re: Photon hits an atom Old Man (11/13/04)
    • Re: Photon hits an atom tj Frazir (11/14/04)
  • Re: Photon hits an atom Andr? Michaud (11/14/04)
  • re:Photon hits an atom Doodedski (11/15/04)
    • Re: Photon hits an atom Andr? Michaud (11/15/04)
  • Re: Photon hits an atom Harry Conover (11/15/04)
  • re:Photon hits an atom Doodedski (11/15/04)
• First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime habshi (11/12/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/13/04)
    • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Edward Green (11/15/04)
      • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/15/04)
      • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Edward Green (11/16/04)
      • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Timo Nieminen (11/15/04)
      • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Edward Green (11/17/04)
      • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Uncle Al (11/13/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Albert N Humperleggalot (11/13/04)
    • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Subir (11/13/04)
  • Re: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime Subir (11/15/04)
  • Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Robert Clark (11/16/04)
    • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/16/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Robert Clark (11/17/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/17/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Robert Clark (11/18/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/18/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Me (11/18/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Me (11/18/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Me (11/17/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Robert Clark (11/18/04)
      • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Me (11/18/04)
    • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] Me (11/16/04)
    • Re: Ultra-Large Airship (ULA) for fighting forest fies. [was: First airship heavier than air can take off and land on a dime] puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/18/04)
• What's New -- Friday, November 12, 2004 -- Bob Park Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• A new modification to the S.P.Research Charter! greywolf42 (11/12/04)
  • Re: A new modification to the S.P.Research Charter! Uncle Al (11/12/04)
    • Re: A new modification to the S.P.Research Charter! greywolf42 (11/13/04)
      • Re: A new modification to the S.P.Research Charter! TomGee (11/14/04)
• neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/12/04)
  • Re: neutrino oscillationists Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: neutrino oscillationists Uncle Al (11/12/04)
  • Re: neutrino oscillationists robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
  • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Creighton Hogg (11/15/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/15/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists greywolf42 (11/15/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/16/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists greywolf42 (11/16/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/16/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Creighton Hogg (11/18/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists William Creighton (11/20/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/18/04)
      • Re: neutrino oscillationists Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/17/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/17/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/17/04)
    • Re: neutrino oscillationists Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/18/04)
  • re:neutrino oscillationists DAH (11/19/04)
• Lyapunov stability GRad (11/12/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Dave Langers (11/14/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Robert Israel (11/14/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
• Need Near Field equations problems curiousjohn4 (11/12/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Richard Clark (11/14/04)
    • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Frank (11/16/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Roy Lewallen (11/14/04)
• A question involving a pedestrian being hit by a car Anopheles (11/12/04)
  • Re: A question involving a pedestrian being hit by a car John T Lowry (11/12/04)
  • Re: A question involving a pedestrian being hit by a car Ian Stirling (11/12/04)
    • Re: A question involving a pedestrian being hit by a car Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
      • Re: A question involving a pedestrian being hit by a car pete (11/14/04)
• hydrogen atoms Senad Subasic (11/12/04)
  • Re: hydrogen atoms Uncle Al (11/12/04)
    • Re: hydrogen atoms Senad Subasic (11/12/04)
      • Re: hydrogen atoms Uncle Al (11/12/04)
      • Re: hydrogen atoms Senad Subasic (11/12/04)
      • Re: hydrogen atoms robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
• Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/12/04)
  • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Morituri-Max (11/12/04)
    • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Uncle Al (11/12/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Morituri-Max (11/13/04)
  • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Uncle Al (11/12/04)
    • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? tj Frazir (11/13/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/15/04)
  • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/15/04)
    • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/18/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/18/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/18/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Bob Cain (11/19/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/19/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/19/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Gregory L. Hansen (11/19/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Jon Bell (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Gregory L. Hansen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? Eckard Blumschein (11/18/04)
      • Re: Is physics really a matter of belief? tj Frazir (11/18/04)
• Sharon's grave Maleki (11/12/04)
• Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (11/12/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (11/14/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (11/15/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (11/17/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (11/18/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (11/17/04)
• The Source of Gravitational Energy Rotidewq (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Uncle Al (11/12/04)
• Experiment confirms existence of new electronic state in superconductors Neutron (11/12/04)
• Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Mike Darrett (11/12/04)
  • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
    • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Eric Gisse (11/15/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
  • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? hostmaster_at_mistral.net (11/13/04)
    • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Mike Darrett (11/14/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Mike Darrett (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Sam Wormley (11/16/04)
      • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
  • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? mike3 (11/15/04)
    • Re: Is the solar neutrino problem solved yet? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
    • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/20/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
• A universe, not abstract, mathematical, but concrete, physical : Jean T?r?metz (11/12/04)
  • Re: A universe, not abstract, mathematical, but concrete, physical : Uncle Al (11/12/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder Nov/11/2004 Morituri-Max (11/12/04)
• Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (11/12/04)
  • Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ V ertner Vergon (11/14/04)
• Timeless Acceleration Mitchell (11/12/04)
  • Re: Timeless Acceleration Uncle Al (11/12/04)
• Re: Apropos the kinetic connexion between electromagnetism and gravity? Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• Superconductors take an odd turn Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Allan Adler (11/12/04)
  • Re: nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Allan Adler (11/12/04)
    • Re: nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Allan Adler (11/15/04)
      • Re: nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
  • Re: nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Y.Porat (11/16/04)
• Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? James Landle (11/12/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? Morituri-Max (11/12/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
    • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? Y.Porat (11/14/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? Andr? Michaud (11/12/04)
    • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? Y.Porat (11/14/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? FrediFizzx (11/12/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? sales_at_mistral.net (11/13/04)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability? John Sefton (11/14/04)
• Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (11/12/04)
  • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? J.E. (11/13/04)
    • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (11/14/04)
      • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? fishfry (11/14/04)
      • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (11/15/04)
      • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? J.E. (11/15/04)
• RElativity theory ipoddarren (11/11/04)
  • Re: RElativity theory Eugene Shubert (11/11/04)
    • Re: RElativity theory Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
      • Re: RElativity theory Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
  • Re: RElativity theory Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: RElativity theory Uncle Al (11/12/04)
  • Re: RElativity theory The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
• explain tide to me please... alt sci (11/11/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... Uncle Al (11/12/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... Patrick Powers (11/12/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... Bruce Bowen (11/12/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... kdthrge (11/13/04)
    • Re: explain tide to me please... tj Frazir (11/13/04)
    • Re: explain tide to me please... tj Frazir (11/13/04)
  • Re: explain tide to me please... tj Frazir (11/13/04)
• Charge contained in a torus-Are one of my answers right? JKJK (11/11/04)
  • Re: Charge contained in a torus-Are one of my answers right? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/12/04)
• A Homegrown Terror Network for America? Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/11/04)
• Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/11/04)
  • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Baby Elian (11/12/04)
  • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dez Akin (11/12/04)
    • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Uncle Al (11/12/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Ian Stirling (11/12/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Uncle Al (11/12/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel aSkeptic (11/13/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel G. R. L. Cowan (11/13/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Uncle Al (11/13/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel jitney (11/15/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Tim Miller (11/16/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dez Akin (11/15/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/17/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dez Akin (11/18/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/18/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Eunometic (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Eunometic (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Tim Miller (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dez Akin (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Baby Elian (11/19/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Dez Akin (11/20/04)
      • Re: Breeder reactor: And the winner is... metallic fuel Baby Elian (11/20/04)
• NEW SUBSTITUTE FOR LEAD Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/11/04)
  • Re: NEW SUBSTITUTE FOR LEAD Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
• ORIGIN OF COSMIC RAYS DETERMINED Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/11/04)
  • Re: ORIGIN OF COSMIC RAYS DETERMINED DrPostman (11/12/04)
• Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
  • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
    • Re: Masterminds Lady Chatterly (11/12/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Cujo DeSockpuppet (11/13/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Kali (11/13/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/13/04)
      • Re: Masterminds O.Ryon Archer (11/14/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Lady Chatterly (11/15/04)
      • Re: Masterminds O.Ryon Archer (11/13/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/13/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
  • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/13/04)
    • Re: Masterminds O.Ryon Archer (11/14/04)
      • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/14/04)
    • Re: Masterminds Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/14/04)
• After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Jupiter (11/11/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Ronald Benedik (11/11/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/11/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? John Popelish (11/11/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? B Gilmour (11/11/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Jupiter (11/11/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/11/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? OG (11/11/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? John Popelish (11/12/04)
    • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? James Fowkes (11/12/04)
    • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? John Morriss (11/12/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Mark Martin (11/12/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Ian Stirling (11/12/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
  • Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? tj Frazir (11/14/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Ian Stirling (11/15/04)
• Re: After a bath lost 2-300 grams? Richard Herring (11/18/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/11/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Patrick Powers (11/12/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Patrick Powers (11/12/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Maleki (11/12/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Maleki (11/12/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Maleki (11/12/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Mark Fergerson (11/13/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Maleki (11/14/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Bob Cain (11/17/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 708 November 10, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Mark Fergerson (11/17/04)
• The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Yddubgs (11/11/04)
  • Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Sam Wormley (11/11/04)
  • Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Uncle Al (11/11/04)
• Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Malcolm (11/11/04)
• SOLAR PANELS MANDATORY IN NEW BUILDINGS Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/11/04)
• Freezing water in a totally rigid container Tim (11/11/04)
  • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Randy Poe (11/11/04)
    • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Andy Resnick (11/11/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Uncle Al (11/11/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Edward Green (11/11/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Uncle Al (11/12/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Andy Resnick (11/12/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Edward Green (11/12/04)
      • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container tj Frazir (11/12/04)
    • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
  • Re: Freezing water in a totally rigid container Uncle Al (11/11/04)
• A train that runs on feathers Sam Wormley (11/11/04)
  • Re: A train that runs on feathers Uncle Al (11/11/04)
• Underground train tunnel a huge success habshi (11/11/04)
  • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success Uncle Al (11/11/04)
    • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success Joe Cummings (11/11/04)
      • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success soup_or_power_at_yahoo.com (11/11/04)
    • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success John of Aix (11/11/04)
  • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/11/04)
    • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success habshi (11/12/04)
      • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/12/04)
      • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success habshi (11/12/04)
      • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/13/04)
      • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success Edward Green (11/15/04)
    • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success Edward Green (11/15/04)
  • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success John of Aix (11/11/04)
    • Re: Underground train tunnel a huge success habshi (11/12/04)
• Re: My 5000 Volt Electrostatic Voltmeter Uncle Al (11/10/04)
• Re: Time- a short discourse Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: Time- a short discourse Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
• The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
  • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Uncle Al (11/10/04)
    • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Mike (11/11/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) tj Frazir (11/16/04)
  • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
    • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
      • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
  • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Mike (11/11/04)
    • Re: The path of least resistance (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
• dipole coordinates BA (11/10/04)
  • Re: dipole coordinates BA (11/10/04)
  • Re: dipole coordinates Uncle Al (11/11/04)
• What is light really? Ove Engvvik (11/10/04)
  • Re: What is light really? Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: What is light really? BBC's James Copnall (11/11/04)
  • Re: What is light really? Old Man (11/10/04)
    • Re: What is light really? RP (11/11/04)
  • Re: What is light really? TomGee (11/13/04)
• Re: Need Near Field equations problems Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems \ (11/10/04)
• Newton's law and dark matter claude-morichon (11/10/04)
  • Re: Newton's law and dark matter Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: Newton's law and dark matter Uncle Al (11/10/04)
• The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Sigmus (11/10/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Smokey (11/10/04)
    • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Bookman (11/10/04)
    • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Dick Eastman for Congress - 2006 (11/10/04)
    • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 John Griffin (11/11/04)
      • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Morituri-Max (11/11/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 LoRdS0fAcId (11/10/04)
    • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 DrPostman (11/10/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 D.E. (11/10/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 DrPostman (11/10/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/11/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 John Griffin (11/11/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Frank Dwyer (11/11/04)
  • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Ray Fischer (11/13/04)
    • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/13/04)
      • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 Ray Fischer (11/14/04)
      • Re: The jet that was shot down on 9-11 was headed to WTC Bldg. #7 First_Blood (11/14/04)
• Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Evgenij Barsukov (11/10/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? zigoteau (11/11/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Dr. Photon (11/12/04)
• Forces in a finite bounded universe Richard Tobin (11/10/04)
  • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Richard Tobin (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Richard Tobin (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe RP (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Richard Tobin (11/10/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Edward Green (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe George Jones (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Edward Green (11/14/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe George Jones (11/18/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Edward Green (11/20/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Edward Green (11/11/04)
      • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/11/04)
    • Re: Forces in a finite bounded universe Edward Green (11/11/04)
• Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) Gnitadwq (11/10/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) Paul Reynolds (11/10/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) Uncle Al (11/10/04)
• PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/10/04)
  • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
    • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/12/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! FrediFizzx (11/12/04)
  • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Jim Heckman (11/11/04)
    • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/11/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Quantum Mirror (11/11/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/12/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Quantum Mirror (11/12/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/15/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/17/04)
  • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Mark Martin (11/12/04)
    • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/15/04)
      • Re: PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! Dreamer (11/17/04)
• *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING (World) Fri/Sat 12/13 Nov 2004: for Eid-ul-Fitr 1425 AH *** Dr. Mohib. N. Durrani (11/10/04)
• Physics: Rotational Kinematics slickn_sly (11/10/04)
  • Re: Physics: Rotational Kinematics Jon Bell (11/10/04)
  • Re: Physics: Rotational Kinematics puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/10/04)
• This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
    • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
    • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
    • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Efftard K. Donglemeier (11/11/04)
      • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/20/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/20/04)
  • Re: This is how it works formally (double entendre) May Day Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/20/04)
• quantum-foam inflow theory of gravity mountain man (11/10/04)
  • Re: quantum-foam inflow theory of gravity FrediFizzx (11/10/04)
    • Re: quantum-foam inflow theory of gravity mountain man (11/11/04)
• Gravitational Time Sam. Mitchell (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. jahn (11/10/04)
      • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
  • re:Gravitational Time Sam. DAH (11/10/04)
    • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Mitchell (11/10/04)
• A curse, damnation/forever condemnation.. Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: A curse, damnation/forever condemnation.. Uncle Al (11/10/04)
    • Re: A curse, damnation/forever condemnation.. Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
  • Re: A curse, damnation/forever condemnation.. Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
• Homeless in New York... Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: Homeless in New York... Uncle Al (11/10/04)
• Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
  • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Uncle Al (11/10/04)
  • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
    • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/12/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/13/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/16/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/18/04)
      • Re: My best threads are in the bottom Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/19/04)
• IBM tops supercomputing table Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: IBM tops supercomputing table Uncle Al (11/10/04)
    • Re: IBM tops supercomputing table Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
• PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
  • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
    • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
    • Re: PV costs Repeating Rifle (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Repeating Rifle (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Rob Buckley (11/10/04)
    • Re: PV costs Tom Potter (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs David Bostwick (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs hanson (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs hanson (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Uncle Al (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs hanson (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Jeppe Madsen (11/12/04)
      • Re: PV costs Guenther von Knakspott (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/10/04)
      • Re: PV costs Tom Potter (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/14/04)
      • Re: PV costs Tom Potter (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Tom Potter (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Tom Potter (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Charles (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Charles (11/11/04)
      • Re: PV costs Bruce Sinclair (11/14/04)
    • Re: PV costs dave e (11/10/04)
  • Re: PV costs Anonymous (11/11/04)
• Arafat Pronounced DEAD! Yippee Yaohoo! Daniel Joseph Min (11/09/04)
  • Re: Arafat Pronounced DEAD! Yippee Yaohoo! T.T. (11/10/04)
    • Re: Arafat Pronounced DEAD! Yippee Yaohoo! Eddie Trimarchi (11/11/04)
      • Re: Arafat Pronounced DEAD! Yippee Yaohoo! William R Phillips (11/12/04)
• Re: Larson -ian Binary Star Formations Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
  • Re: Larson -ian Binary Star Formations Uncle Al (11/09/04)
    • Re: Larson -ian Binary Star Formations The Ghost In The Machine (11/10/04)
• Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Adrian Mark Armstrong (11/09/04)
  • Re: Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Michael J. Strickland (11/09/04)
  • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Randy Poe (11/09/04)
  • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Mark Martin (11/09/04)
  • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Uncle Al (11/09/04)
  • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
    • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter greywolf42 (11/10/04)
  • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter FrediFizzx (11/11/04)
    • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Mark Martin (11/11/04)
      • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter FrediFizzx (11/11/04)
    • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter Michael Moroney (11/11/04)
      • Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter FrediFizzx (11/12/04)
• Re: UK company brings affordable home windmill to the masses G. R. L. Cowan (11/09/04)
  • Re: UK company brings affordable home windmill to the masses Pete Lynn (11/10/04)
• Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
  • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
    • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
      • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) John Sefton (11/10/04)
      • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
      • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
      • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Morituri-Max (11/10/04)
  • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Bob Cain (11/10/04)
    • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
    • Re: Theory of beliefs (model of browhaha) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/11/04)
• A runner miscellaneous (11/09/04)
  • Re: A runner Randy Poe (11/09/04)
  • Re: A runner puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/09/04)
  • Re: A runner Steven Gray (11/10/04)
• PHYSICS content Eckard Blumschein (11/09/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS content Uncle Al (11/09/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS content Eckard Blumschein (11/10/04)
• The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems (#15) Clihcwq (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems (#15) Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems (#15) Uncle Al (11/09/04)
• special problems miscellaneous (11/09/04)
  • Re: special problems John T Lowry (11/09/04)
  • Re: special problems Randy Poe (11/09/04)
  • Re: special problems puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/09/04)
• RADIATION MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/09/04)
  • Re: RADIATION MECHANICS Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
• Re: Big Bang Question nightbat (11/09/04)
• Impact time with football Søren Thestrup Hansen (11/09/04)
  • Re: Impact time with football SDown (11/09/04)
• Emotional resistance Eckard Blumschein (11/09/04)
  • Re: Emotional resistance Philip Holman (11/10/04)
    • Re: Emotional resistance Eckard Blumschein (11/10/04)
• How to use GuruNet as a dictionary. Jeff_Relf (11/09/04)
  • Re: How to use GuruNet as a dictionary. Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
    • Navigating Usenet ( and life ). Jeff_Relf (11/09/04)
      • Re: Navigating Usenet ( and life ). Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
      • GuruNet is for Sci.Physics too. Jeff_Relf (11/10/04)
      • Re: GuruNet is for Sci.Physics too. Rick (11/10/04)
      • Re: GuruNet is for Sci.Physics too. Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
      • Re: GuruNet is for Sci.Physics too. Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/10/04)
      • Re: GuruNet is for Sci.Physics too. Jeff_Relf (11/12/04)
      • Re: Navigating Usenet ( and life ). Kelsey Bjarnason (11/10/04)
      • Re: Navigating Usenet ( and life ). Barry Jones (11/10/04)
      • Speaking of news you can use... Jeff_Relf (11/11/04)
      • Re: Speaking of news you can use... Uncle Al (11/11/04)
      • Re: Speaking of news you can use... John Bailo (11/11/04)
      • Usenet is like a giant party-line. Jeff_Relf (11/11/04)
      • Re: Usenet is like a giant party-line. Mark Martin (11/12/04)
      • Use your nob. Jeff_Relf (11/12/04)
      • Re: Use your nob. MartinS (11/12/04)
      • Re: Use your nob. Mark Martin (11/13/04)
      • Re: Speaking of news you can use... The Ghost In The Machine (11/11/04)
      • You can't get any better documentation than that. Jeff_Relf (11/12/04)
      • Re: Speaking of news you can use... Hamilcar Barca (11/12/04)
• The Republican Agenda Nomen Nescio (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda EjP (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Chris Boscarino (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Peter Kupfer (11/10/04)
    • Re: The Republican Agenda Daniel Joseph Min (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Daniel Joseph Min (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Peter Kupfer (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Laura (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Peter Kupfer (11/13/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
    • Re: The Republican Agenda narvikdesi (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda narvikdesi (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda EjP (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Peter Hickman (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
    • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda narvikdesi (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/14/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Martin Frey (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/13/04)
    • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Edward Green (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Bruce Scott TOK (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Bruce Scott TOK (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Martin Frey (11/18/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/18/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda joerevskelton_at_bellsouth.net (11/18/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Martin Frey (11/18/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/18/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda Gregory L. Hansen (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Republican Agenda mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/16/04)
    • Re: The Republican Agenda ZZBunker (11/16/04)
• Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action Harlan Osier (11/09/04)
  • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action Rushtown (11/09/04)
  • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action Morituri-Max (11/09/04)
  • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action pete (11/09/04)
  • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action Uncle Al (11/09/04)
    • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action Richard Herring (11/09/04)
    • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action pete (11/10/04)
  • Re: Mysterious "high-tech" serial killer in action robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 November 2004 Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
  • Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 November 2004 pete (11/09/04)
• A central force problem Edward Green (11/09/04)
  • Re: A central force problem George Jones (11/09/04)
  • Re: A central force problem Mel Lep (11/09/04)
    • Re: A central force problem Mike (11/09/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Mel Lep (11/10/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Mike (11/10/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Edward Green (11/11/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Mike (11/12/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Edward Green (11/10/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Edward Green (11/10/04)
    • Re: A central force problem Mel Lep (11/09/04)
  • Re: A central force problem puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/09/04)
  • Re: A central force problem puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/09/04)
    • Re: A central force problem Edward Green (11/10/04)
      • Re: A central force problem RP (11/11/04)
      • Re: A central force problem Mike (11/11/04)
• The Elements, just for fun... Dan Bloomquist (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Uncle Al (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Damon Hill (11/09/04)
    • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Don Lancaster (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Karl Johanson (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Maleki (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Elements, just for fun... Kimmo Klemola (11/11/04)
• Carbon 14 question Michael Moroney (11/08/04)
  • Re: Carbon 14 question Llanzlan Klazmon (11/09/04)
  • Re: Carbon 14 question Uncle Al (11/09/04)
    • Re: Carbon 14 question Michael Moroney (11/10/04)
  • Re: Carbon 14 question Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
• What's the Matter with Einstein? purrcy (11/08/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Uncle Al (11/08/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Buba Zebop (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? operator jay (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Paul Cardinale (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
• Quartz parity divergence calculation Uncle Al (11/08/04)
• Monte Carlo Modeling of Sputter Deposition (in matlab) rajib (11/08/04)
• Green Flash + Diffraction Around Wedge at Pt. Reyes W. Watson (11/08/04)
  • Re: Green Flash + Diffraction Around Wedge at Pt. Reyes Jack Martinelli (11/10/04)
    • Re: Green Flash + Diffraction Around Wedge at Pt. Reyes Mark Fergerson (11/10/04)
      • Re: Green Flash + Diffraction Around Wedge at Pt. Reyes Richard Herring (11/10/04)
      • Re: Green Flash + Diffraction Around Wedge at Pt. Reyes W. Watson (11/12/04)
• re:Infrared Specific Reflection? apowers (11/08/04)
• Re: Physics Student Needs Help AC (11/08/04)
  • Re: Physics Student Needs Help Peter Kupfer (11/09/04)
• Help with Physics problems - Rotational motion and Center of Mass alan (11/08/04)
  • Re: Help with Physics problems - Rotational motion and Center of Mass Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
• USAF Teleportation Contract: Good, Bad & Bogus Jack Sarfatti (11/08/04)
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208) John Baez (11/08/04)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208) Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208) Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208) Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Morituri-Max (11/08/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 tj Frazir (11/09/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Charles Packer (11/09/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Nov8:2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/10/04)
• Gedanken Experiment Angelo (11/08/04)
  • Re: Gedanken Experiment Old Man (11/09/04)
    • Re: Gedanken Experiment Angelo (11/09/04)
      • Re: Gedanken Experiment Old Man (11/10/04)
• Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Jack Sarfatti (11/08/04)
  • Re: Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
• Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Tseggusq (11/08/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) maarten (11/08/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Uncle Al (11/08/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) ZZBunker (11/08/04)
    • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Dr. Photon (11/09/04)
      • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) ZZBunker (11/10/04)
      • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Dr. Photon (11/10/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Dr. Photon (11/10/04)
• I thought it'd be harder :-) Maleki (11/08/04)
  • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) Maleki (11/08/04)
    • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) hanson (11/08/04)
      • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) hanson (11/08/04)
      • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) Maleki (11/09/04)
      • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) hanson (11/10/04)
      • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) Maleki (11/11/04)
  • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/08/04)
    • Re: I thought it'd be harder :-) hanson (11/09/04)
• Indian made electric car goes on sale in Britain habshi (11/08/04)
• Open position : Junior software engineer Nathalie Van den Bogaert (11/08/04)
• Physics: pulley slickn_sly (11/08/04)
  • Re: Physics: pulley Randy Poe (11/08/04)
  • Physics - pulley slickn_sly (11/09/04)
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 08, 2004 PhDs.org Webmaster (11/08/04)
• I feel vindicated. rick sobie (11/08/04)
  • Re: I feel vindicated. Morituri-Max (11/08/04)
    • Re: I feel vindicated. rick sobie (11/08/04)
      • Re: I feel vindicated. Morituri-Max (11/08/04)
  • Re: I feel vindicated. Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
    • Re: I feel vindicated. robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: I feel vindicated. tj Frazir (11/08/04)
      • Re: I feel vindicated. Morituri-Max (11/08/04)
      • Re: I feel vindicated. Bob Cain (11/09/04)
      • Re: I feel vindicated. The Ghost (11/11/04)
• Metric Time Gremlin (11/08/04)
  • Re: Metric Time Uncle Al (11/08/04)
• Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/08/04)
  • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mark Fergerson (11/08/04)
    • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/09/04)
      • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle tj Frazir (11/09/04)
      • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/11/04)
  • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
    • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
      • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle John Zinni (11/08/04)
  • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
    • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle tj Frazir (11/09/04)
    • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle tj Frazir (11/09/04)
  • Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Uncle Al (11/08/04)
• Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
  • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/08/04)
    • Re: Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement rge11x (11/09/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
  • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/08/04)
    • Re: Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Andy Resnick (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/11/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo A. Nieminen (11/12/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/13/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement John C. Polasek (11/13/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo A. Nieminen (11/13/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement John C. Polasek (11/14/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/14/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/14/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/14/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/15/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/16/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement Timo Nieminen (11/16/04)
    • Re: Convolving the Displacement rge11x (11/09/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/09/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement rge11x (11/09/04)
      • Re: Convolving the Displacement zigoteau (11/11/04)
• Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/08/04)
  • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/08/04)
    • Wisconsin Teaching Creationism [Was: Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?)] Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (11/08/04)
• The Smithsonian Institute's interview with Bill Gates. Jeff_Relf (11/08/04)
  • Re: The Smithsonian Institute's interview with Bill Gates. John Bailo (11/08/04)
    • Re: The Smithsonian Institute's interview with Bill Gates. Jeff_Relf (11/08/04)
      • Old Country Buffet & Suse Lizards John Bailo (11/08/04)
      • The bums on the Ave. Jeff_Relf (11/08/04)
      • Re: Old Country Buffet & Suse Lizards gnohmon_at_panix.com (11/08/04)
      • Re: Old Country Buffet & Suse Lizards John Bailo (11/08/04)
      • Re: The Smithsonian Institute's interview with Bill Gates. Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
• Second measure of time? Chris (11/07/04)
  • Re: Second measure of time? mike3 (11/08/04)
• 2nd Law - PW Atkins o (11/07/04)
  • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
    • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Steve Spence (11/11/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Harry Conover (11/11/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Don Kelly (11/14/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Jo Stein (11/14/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Roland Paterson-Jones (11/14/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins chris h fleming (11/15/04)
      • Re: 2nd Law - PW Atkins Fred McGalliard (11/15/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . JeremyH (11/15/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . Hatunen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . chaching (11/17/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . Garbi (11/17/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . Pete Lynn (11/17/04)
      • Re: Pitfalls of science. . . Mr Clarke (11/15/04)
• Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/07/04)
  • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
    • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
    • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/10/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/10/04)
  • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bilge (11/07/04)
  • Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action ZZBunker (11/08/04)
• PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Archimedes Plutonium (11/07/04)
  • Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 flip (11/07/04)
  • Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Efftard K. Donglemeier (11/08/04)
    • Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Earle Jones (11/13/04)
  • M.A.D. songs Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Archimedes Plutonium (11/08/04)
    • Re: M.A.D. songs Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Archimedes Plutonium (11/09/04)
    • Re: M.A.D. songs Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 ZZBunker (11/10/04)
  • Re: PLUTONIUM DAY, 7November 2004 Mr. 4X (11/11/04)
• Oh My! :-) Maleki (11/07/04)
  • Re: Oh My! :-) Jim Hubbard (11/07/04)
    • Re: Oh My! :-) Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) Jim Hubbard (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) tadchem (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) hanson (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) Jim Hubbard (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/08/04)
      • Re: Oh My! :-) Maleki (11/09/04)
• Maybe somethings shrinking. Andrew E. Smyth (11/07/04)
  • Re: Maybe somethings shrinking. Olgie Ogilthorpe (11/07/04)
    • Re: Maybe somethings shrinking. Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
      • Re: Maybe somethings shrinking. tj Frazir (11/09/04)
  • Re: Maybe somethings shrinking. Old Man (11/08/04)
    • Re: Maybe somethings shrinking. Gonzalo Fernandez Ordas (11/10/04)
• Expansion at the speed of light. Andrew E. Smyth (11/07/04)
  • Re: Expansion at the speed of light. Pepe le Pew (11/07/04)
    • Re: Expansion at the speed of light. Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
      • Re: Expansion at the speed of light. tj Frazir (11/09/04)
  • re:Expansion at the speed of light. Miguel (11/09/04)
    • Re: Expansion at the speed of light. Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
• "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/07/04)
  • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Ian Stirling (11/07/04)
    • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/08/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Minny Hatton (11/08/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/09/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Ian Stirling (11/09/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/13/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. George Dishman (11/13/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/15/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. George Dishman (11/15/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/15/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. George Dishman (11/15/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/21/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Aidan Karley (11/13/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/13/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Ian Stirling (11/13/04)
  • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Robert Clark (11/14/04)
    • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Aidan Karley (11/14/04)
      • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Ian Stirling (11/14/04)
  • Re: "Rockets not carrying fuel" for orbital transfer. Edward Green (11/15/04)
• re:tv detector vans Kavokei (11/07/04)
  • Re: re:tv detector vans jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (11/07/04)
  • Re: re:tv detector vans Kavokei (11/08/04)
• Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field xxein (11/12/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/07/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ZZBunker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/17/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bob Cain (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/08/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/08/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Justin Lewis (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/21/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/21/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field John Chelen (11/10/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/10/04)
    • Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/12/04)
      • Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
  • Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
• Question about Poiseuille's formula. Robert Clark (11/07/04)
  • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
  • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. George Dishman (11/07/04)
  • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. M.S. Cramer (11/08/04)
    • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Pete K. (11/09/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. M.S. Cramer (11/12/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. M.S. Cramer (11/12/04)
    • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Robert Clark (11/12/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Robert Clark (11/14/04)
  • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Robert Clark (11/13/04)
    • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. George Dishman (11/13/04)
    • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. David Wilkinson (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. M.S. Cramer (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Aidan Karley (11/13/04)
    • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. M.S. Cramer (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. George Dishman (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Aidan Karley (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/13/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Aidan Karley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Paul Hobson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. Robert Clark (11/14/04)
      • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. George Dishman (11/14/04)
  • Re: Question about Poiseuille's formula. John C. Polasek (11/13/04)
• The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets (#13) Einsteinhoax (11/07/04)
  • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets (#13) Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
    • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets (#13) G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/08/04)
      • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets (#13) Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
  • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets (#13) Uncle Al (11/08/04)
• Ice balls killed 600 habshi (11/07/04)
  • Re: Ice balls killed 600 Uncle Al (11/08/04)
• Re: Mobile toy Dave (11/07/04)
  • Re: Mobile toy Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
  • Re: Mobile toy Mark Martin (11/07/04)
  • Re: Mobile toy CWatters (11/07/04)
  • Re: Mobile toy Horace Heffner (11/07/04)
  • Re: Mobile toy Uncle Al (11/08/04)
    • Re: Mobile toy Richard (11/09/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy Mark Martin (11/09/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy Richard (11/10/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy Uncle Al (11/10/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy Jim Kelley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy tj Frazir (11/11/04)
      • Re: Mobile toy Isaac Wingfield (11/10/04)
• AUSTRALIA OFFICIAL THANKS AT LAST ! Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/07/04)
• It pays to be the first to write development tools. Jeff_Relf (11/07/04)
  • It pays to understand particle board. John Bailo (11/07/04)
    • Re: It pays to understand particle board. Jeff_Relf (11/07/04)
  • The argument for comercial code. Jeff_Relf (11/07/04)
    • Re: The argument for comercial code. rick sobie (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. Jeff_Relf (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. Rick (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. John Bailo (11/08/04)
    • Re: The argument for comercial code. Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. Peter Köhlmann (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. Edwin (11/08/04)
      • Re: The argument for comercial code. Peter Köhlmann (11/08/04)
• GO AHEAD FOR "BLUE WATER PROJECT" NEXT YEAR IN AUSTRALIA Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/07/04)
• The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/07/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help RP (11/08/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help RP (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help David Thomson (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Tom Roberts (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Patrick Reany (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help David Thomson (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help George Jones (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help George Jones (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Androcles (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Androcles (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eric Gisse (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Uncle Al (11/08/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gene Ward Smith (11/08/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Will Twentyman (11/08/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Will Twentyman (11/09/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/09/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/11/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Anon (11/10/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Anon (11/10/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/11/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chan-Ho Suh (11/11/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help stephen_at_nomail.com (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help stephen_at_nomail.com (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/16/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/07/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION Steve Ralph (11/07/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/08/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION kenseto (11/07/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION tadchem (11/07/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/08/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION tadchem (11/09/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/10/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION tadchem (11/10/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/09/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION kenseto (11/09/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/09/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION kenseto (11/09/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION Uncle Al (11/08/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/08/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION June R Harton (11/12/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/13/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION em (11/14/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/14/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION em (11/16/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/16/04)
      • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION em (11/18/04)
  • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION Mike Helland (11/16/04)
    • Re: EXPLAINING TIME DILATION TomGee (11/17/04)
• Bush may be right after all about the offshoring of work. Borce Gjoneski (11/07/04)
• Did you say $70 Billion? :-) Maleki (11/06/04)
  • Re: Did you say $70 Billion? :-) Harry Conover (11/07/04)
    • Re: Did you say $70 Billion? :-) Maleki (11/07/04)
    • Re: Did you say $70 Billion? :-) The Ghost In The Machine (11/07/04)
    • Re: Did you say $70 Billion? :-) Douglas Scot Gillman (11/08/04)
• Argon in ultraviolet medium pressure mercury lamps marcio_at_visioncure.com.br (11/06/04)
• Q: AIP/APS biblography format .dot Uncle Al (11/06/04)
• Any way to produce rotation in suspended particles Adi Anant (11/06/04)
  • Re: Any way to produce rotation in suspended particles Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: Any way to produce rotation in suspended particles Adi Anant (11/07/04)
  • Re: Any way to produce rotation in suspended particles Narasimham G.L. (11/07/04)
  • Re: Any way to produce rotation in suspended particles Timo Nieminen (11/07/04)
• TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/06/04)
  • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS quibbler (11/07/04)
    • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Ian St. John (11/07/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS hanson (11/07/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Ian St. John (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS (correction) Ian St. John (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS (correction) hanson (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS ZZBunker (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Ian St. John (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS ZZBunker (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Eunometic (11/09/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS hanson (11/09/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS quibbler (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Ian St. John (11/08/04)
      • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Dean Hoffman (11/08/04)
  • Re: TRIAL RUN OF BIO-DIESEL CARS BEGINS Eunometic (11/08/04)
• DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/06/04)
  • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Wally Anglesea (11/06/04)
    • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/07/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Wally Anglesea (11/07/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA John Beaver (11/08/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Epigram (11/08/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Charles Hawtrey (11/10/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Magwitch (11/10/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Epigram (11/12/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Wally Anglesea™ (11/10/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Epigram (11/12/04)
    • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA don findlay (11/08/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Wally Anglesea™ (11/08/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA don findlay (11/11/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Wally Anglesea™ (11/11/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Magwitch (11/11/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA don findlay (11/11/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA Lady Chatterly (11/12/04)
      • Re: DDD TO WORSEN TILL MY RETURN TO AUSTRALIA george (11/13/04)
• Recommend quantum chemistry text? Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
  • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? dtn (11/07/04)
    • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
      • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Allan Adler (11/08/04)
      • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
  • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Thomas Lee Elifritz (11/07/04)
  • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Mark Tarka (11/07/04)
    • Re: Recommend quantum chemistry text? Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
• Tensor Physics & WMD Jack Sarfatti (11/06/04)
  • Re: Tensor Physics & WMD ZZBunker (11/08/04)
• ENERGY TRANSFER MECHANCS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (11/06/04)
  • Re: ENERGY TRANSFER MECHANCS Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
• problems facing chemists in the 21st Century Peter (11/06/04)
  • Re: problems facing chemists in the 21st Century Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: problems facing chemists in the 21st Century Maleki (11/06/04)
  • Re: problems facing chemists in the 21st Century ZZBunker (11/08/04)
• Computational vs. analytical James J Albert (11/06/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical John T Lowry (11/06/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical Eric Gisse (11/07/04)
    • Re: Computational vs. analytical James J Albert (11/11/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical George Jones (11/12/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Mike (11/12/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/11/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
    • Re: Computational vs. analytical puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/12/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical James J Albert (11/13/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Gregory L. Hansen (11/13/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Timo Nieminen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Gregory L. Hansen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Timo Nieminen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Computational vs. analytical Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
  • Re: Computational vs. analytical ZZBunker (11/12/04)
• A New Definition for TIME kenseto (11/06/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Jim (11/07/04)
• The Nature of Mass Semanq (11/06/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mass Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mass Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
• Do Virtual Photons Exist? T. Einsteinhoax (11/06/04)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? T. Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? T. Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? T. Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
• Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (11/06/04)
  • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis OutreZoneD (11/07/04)
    • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis RoboTruxium184 (11/08/04)
    • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Pontifex Maximus (11/09/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis intruder (11/09/04)
    • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis intruder (11/09/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis jay (11/10/04)
    • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Blue Resonant Human, Ph.D. (11/10/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Free Speech (11/10/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis OutreZoneD (11/11/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Blue Resonant Human, Ph.D. (11/11/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Free Speech (11/11/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis The Dude (11/11/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Free Speech (11/11/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (11/12/04)
      • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Free Speech (11/12/04)
      • Extinction : With Personal Dignity Free Speech (11/12/04)
      • Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (11/12/04)
      • For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Free Speech (11/14/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Art Deco (11/14/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Free Speech (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Bookman (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Jeremy Donovan (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity RaViNg LuNiTiC © (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Dr. Flonkenstein (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Art Deco (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity RaViNg LuNiTiC © (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Aratzio (11/16/04)
      • Christian Right Seeks Payback Demo Hassan (11/15/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Art Deco (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Aratzio (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Free Speech (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity RaViNg LuNiTiC © (11/17/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Aratzio (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Aratzio (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Art Deco (11/16/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Aratzio (11/17/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity Free Speech (11/17/04)
      • Re: For All Of My Usenet Comrades Re: Extinction : With Personal Dignity The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
      • Will Bush 'Dispose" of His Usenet Posters? Taking Odds on How Long Kit, John, Jacques and Hal Have To Live Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis Free Speech (11/11/04)
  • Re: TELEPORTATION Physics Study by Eric W. Davis jay (11/10/04)
• Re : Explosion of info (was: Branches of Mathematics) Alfred Einstead (11/06/04)
• Relax. Universe to last another 26 billion years Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/06/04)
• OT: ETNI Asetnil (11/06/04)
  • Re: OT: ETNI Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: OT: ETNI Asetnil (11/07/04)
      • Re: OT: ETNI Asetnil (11/11/04)
      • Re: OT: ETNI Mark Fergerson (11/11/04)
      • Re: OT: ETNI Asetnil (11/12/04)
• Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
    • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/06/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Dave Jones (11/06/04)
    • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/07/04)
    • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/07/04)
  • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/07/04)
    • Re: Joust(ice): the making of a billionaire Bert Hickman (11/07/04)
• Pesticide Disposal Goes Green Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
  • Re: Pesticide Disposal Goes Green Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: Pesticide Disposal Goes Green hanson (11/06/04)
      • Re: Pesticide Disposal Goes Green Mark Tarka (11/07/04)
• monte carlo hrocho (11/06/04)
  • Re: monte carlo Uncle Al (11/06/04)
• Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
  • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
    • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
    • Re: Diffractive Optics Edward Green (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Edward Green (11/07/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Edward Green (11/07/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Myxococcus xanthus (11/07/04)
  • Re: Diffractive Optics Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
  • Re: Diffractive Optics Edward Green (11/07/04)
    • Re: Diffractive Optics Mark Fergerson (11/09/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Edward Green (11/09/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
      • Re: Diffractive Optics Mark Fergerson (11/10/04)
  • Re: Diffractive Optics Andy Resnick (11/08/04)
    • Re: Diffractive Optics Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
• Two balckhole questions... Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... John Popelish (11/06/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... John Sefton (11/08/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... George Jones (11/10/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... Anthony Cerrato (11/11/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... George Jones (11/11/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... nightbat (11/12/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... George Jones (11/06/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... Edward Green (11/07/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... George Jones (11/07/04)
      • Re: Two balckhole questions... ZZBunker (11/09/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... Mark Martin (11/07/04)
    • Re: Two balckhole questions... Peter Kupfer (11/07/04)
  • Re: Two balckhole questions... carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/08/04)
• Re: Adding sound level dBA values at different frequencies Noral Stewart (11/06/04)
• What if... mike3 (11/06/04)
  • Re: What if... David Canzi -- non-mailable address (11/06/04)
  • Re: What if... Boris Mohar (11/06/04)
  • Re: What if... Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
  • Re: What if... The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
• Cycles Research Institute announcement Ray Tomes (11/06/04)
• The Casimir force is electrostatic in origin not from zero point energy Jack Sarfatti (11/06/04)
• Almost Everything is Expanding Ray Tomes (11/05/04)
  • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/05/04)
    • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Ray Tomes (11/06/04)
      • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
  • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
  • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Uncle Al (11/06/04)
    • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Androcles (11/06/04)
  • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding EL (11/06/04)
    • Re: Almost Everything is Expanding nightbat (11/07/04)
• pulse processing advice jim (11/05/04)
• Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/05/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/08/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Les Cargill (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) JM Albuquerque (11/07/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/07/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/09/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/16/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/07/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) mike3 (11/15/04)
      • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/16/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Rick Russell (11/08/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) ZZBunker (11/15/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/08/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
    • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Douglas Scot Gillman (11/08/04)
  • Re: Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (11/18/04)
• Air Force report calls for $7.5M to study quantum psychic teleportation Giorgio Torrieri (11/05/04)
  • Re: Air Force report calls for $7.5M to study quantum psychic teleportation ZZBunker (11/06/04)
  • Re: Air Force report calls for $7.5M to study quantum psychic teleportation Patrick Powers (11/06/04)
  • Re: Air Force report calls for $7.5M to study quantum psychic teleportation Quantum Mirror (11/06/04)
• What's New -- Friday, November 5, 2004 by Bob Park Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
• BHARAT AMONG TOPPERS IN BIOMASS ENERGY Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/05/04)
• God help America jbg (11/05/04)
  • Re: God help America Uncle Al (11/05/04)
    • Re: God help America Charles (11/05/04)
      • Re: God help America hanson (11/05/04)
  • Re: God help America Maleki (11/05/04)
  • Re: God help America Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
    • Re: God help America The Trucker (11/06/04)
      • Re: God help America Ian St. John (11/06/04)
      • Re: God help America Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
      • Re: God help America Howard (11/10/04)
      • Re: God help America Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
      • Re: God help America Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
• Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (11/05/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (11/05/04)
    • Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (11/05/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (11/06/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (11/06/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (11/06/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (11/06/04)
• Re: 250km/hr magnetic levitation trains to fly soon in India habshi (11/05/04)
• Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (11/05/04)
• Pakistan prepares for 1000 years of drought habshi (11/05/04)
  • Re: Pakistan prepares for 1000 years of drought Uncle Al (11/05/04)
  • Re: Pakistan prepares for 1000 years of drought webmaster_at_mistral.net (11/06/04)
  • Re: Pakistan prepares for 1000 years of drought Maleki (11/07/04)
• Evidence of the Existence of the Aether Tamrofw (11/05/04)
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether Uncle Al (11/05/04)
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
• Speed of gravity Frank Müller (11/05/04)
  • Re: Speed of gravity Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
    • Re: Speed of gravity Frank Müller (11/05/04)
    • Re: Speed of gravity Peter Kupfer (11/06/04)
      • Re: Speed of gravity Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
      • Re: Speed of gravity George Jones (11/06/04)
  • Re: Speed of gravity Uncle Al (11/05/04)
    • Re: Speed of gravity Frank Müller (11/05/04)
• Pentaquarks.... Dreamer (11/05/04)
• Progress in Solar Hydrogen Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/05/04)
• Supernova Explosions mike3 (11/05/04)
  • Re: Supernova Explosions Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
    • Re: Supernova Explosions mike3 (11/06/04)
      • Re: Supernova Explosions Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
• A new type of solar cell Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
• Re: Can the universe spin? Thanatos (11/05/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Thanatos (11/05/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Edward Green (11/07/04)
• Re: Hard to believe! science go wrong way,physics wrong a half! Uncle Al (11/05/04)
  • Re: Hard to believe! science go wrong way,physics wrong a half! News Hound (11/05/04)
• Invasion from the Universe Next Door? Jack Sarfatti (11/05/04)
  • Re: Invasion from the Universe Next Door? Uncle Al (11/05/04)
    • Re: Invasion from the Universe Next Door? John Vreeland (11/06/04)
  • Re: Invasion from the Universe Next Door? webmaster_at_mistral.net (11/06/04)
• So, You Want to Buy a Green Car ... Or Do You? Dr. Jai Maharaj (11/04/04)
• Magnetics questions DAH (11/04/04)
• Re: Physical constants? Shepherd Moon (11/04/04)
• A Unified Field Theory Bill Clark (11/04/04)
  • Re: A Unified Field Theory Minister Ahmed Qurei (11/04/04)
  • Re: A Unified Field Theory Ken S. Tucker (11/06/04)
• Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/04/04)
  • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Uncle Al (11/04/04)
    • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/05/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mark Fergerson (11/05/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/07/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mark Fergerson (11/07/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/08/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mark Fergerson (11/09/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/09/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mark Fergerson (11/10/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/19/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy pete (11/20/04)
      • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Mike Helland (11/21/04)
  • Re: Off Topic, Techmocracy Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
• suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Archimedes Plutonium (11/04/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google John Zinni (11/04/04)
    • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google richard miller (11/04/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Michael Moroney (11/04/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Guy Macon (11/04/04)
    • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google richard miller (11/04/04)
      • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Guy Macon (11/04/04)
      • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
    • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Archimedes Plutonium (11/13/04)
      • does Google differentiate tilda websites from owners? Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Archimedes Plutonium (11/13/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google News Hound (11/05/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google nightbat (11/05/04)
  • Re: suppressing other peoples website from appearing in Google Rod (11/05/04)
• Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Gnilaidz (11/04/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Eugene Shubert (11/04/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
    • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Tamrofw (11/05/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Gregory L. Hansen (11/05/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
    • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Tamrofw (11/05/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Uncle Al (11/04/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? The Ghost In The Machine (11/05/04)
    • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Tamrofw (11/05/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
      • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? complaints_at_mistral.net (11/06/04)
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Mike (11/07/04)
    • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
    • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
• pions as mediators of strong force Teresa (11/04/04)
  • Re: pions as mediators of strong force Mark Martin (11/04/04)
  • Re: pions as mediators of strong force Creighton Hogg (11/04/04)
  • Re: pions as mediators of strong force Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
• Biot-Savart's Companion (11/3/04) David Rutherford (11/04/04)
  • Re: Biot-Savart's Companion (11/3/04) Dave (11/05/04)
• Re: New Battery (2000 Wh/kg) with polymer -[C2(NO)2]n- electrode Karimi (11/04/04)
• refraction problem tsmith (11/04/04)
  • Re: refraction problem Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
  • Re: refraction problem John C. Polasek (11/04/04)
    • Re: refraction problem Old Man (11/04/04)
  • Re: refraction problem Old Man (11/04/04)
  • Re: refraction problem puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/04/04)
• DOZENS OF NUCLEAR DESALINISATION PLANT IN AUSTRALIA TO FACE THE DDD Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/04/04)
  • Re: DOZENS OF NUCLEAR DESALINISATION PLANT IN AUSTRALIA TO FACE THE DDD Wally Anglesea™ (11/04/04)
  • Re: DOZENS OF NUCLEAR DESALINISATION PLANT IN AUSTRALIA TO FACE THE DDD Rene Tschaggelar (11/04/04)
• I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Neptune (11/04/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Clayton...Rapidly Drying Oasis In A Worldwide Desert Of Insanity (11/04/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
    • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Neptune (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Joe (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Kermit (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Clayton...Rapidly Drying Oasis In A Worldwide Desert Of Insanity (11/05/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though maf 1029 (11/06/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Dez Akin (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though lab~rat (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Harry Conover (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Christopher A. Lee (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Daniel Kolle (11/08/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though MF Ogilvie (11/04/04)
    • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Neptune (11/04/04)
    • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though maf 1029 (11/06/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Neptune (11/04/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Jim Austin (11/04/04)
    • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Truth (11/04/04)
      • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though Truth (11/04/04)
  • Re: I am always proud of being it however not under BUSH though duke (11/04/04)
• Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom then what about bacteria? Archimedes Plutonium (11/04/04)
  • Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Archimedes Plutonium (11/04/04)
    • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Uncle Al (11/04/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Loogie (11/04/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Uncle Al (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/05/04)
    • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Archimedes Plutonium (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom David Bostwick (11/05/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom theQuantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/06/04)
    • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/06/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/06/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/06/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/06/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/07/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/07/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom nightbat (11/07/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Cereus-validus. (11/07/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Peter Jason (11/07/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Sean Houtman (11/11/04)
      • Re: Cosmic-Rays in news today as supernova sourced Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom Sean Houtman (11/11/04)
• SALT RAVAGES AUSTRALIA _ as the DDD worsens_ Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (11/04/04)
  • Re: SALT RAVAGES AUSTRALIA _ as the DDD worsens_ Wally Anglesea™ (11/04/04)
    • Re: SALT RAVAGES AUSTRALIA _ as the DDD worsens_ George (11/05/04)
• Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Al Klein (11/04/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Liman Jig Tacker (11/04/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! raven1 (11/04/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Al Klein (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Bruce Pew (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Rune Børsjø (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Joe (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Rune Børsjø (11/04/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! bandido (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Al Klein (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/04/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/05/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Rune Børsjø (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Joe Cummings (11/04/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Maleki (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Mitchell (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Joe Cummings (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Harry Conover (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Joe Cummings (11/05/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
      • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Joe Cummings (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! BllFs6 (11/07/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/05/04)
    • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Alric Knebel (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/05/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Christopher A. Lee (11/07/04)
  • Re: Today I am so Proud to be American!!! Mike Painter (11/07/04)
• Volcanic activity may explain features previously thought to be due to water on Mars Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
• Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Mitchell (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Silas (11/04/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
      • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robo lemon (11/06/04)
      • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator shevek (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Paul Cardinale (11/04/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Mitchell (11/05/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator xxein (11/05/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Uncle Al (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Bruce Pew (11/04/04)
  • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Harry Conover (11/04/04)
    • Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator David Evens (11/06/04)
• turn on the computer and screen is total black Archimedes Plutonium (11/04/04)
  • Re: turn on the computer and screen is total black AC (11/08/04)
  • Re: turn on the computer and screen is total black John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
• Attosecond light pulses will allow physicists... Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
  • re:Attosecond light pulses will allow physicists... DAH (11/04/04)
• Carbon makes its mark Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
  • Re: Carbon makes its mark Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
    • Re: Carbon makes its mark Frank Shahid (11/04/04)
      • Re: Carbon makes its mark Uncle Al (11/04/04)
  • Re: Carbon makes its mark Uncle Al (11/04/04)
  • Re: Carbon makes its mark pete (11/06/04)
• Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Nomen Nescio (11/04/04)
  • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Laura (11/04/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Bob Casanova (11/04/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Harry Conover (11/05/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Peter Hickman (11/05/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Davoud (11/05/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Laura (11/05/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Joe Bergeron (11/05/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Mountainman (11/05/04)
  • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Bill McHale (11/04/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . The Ancient One (11/04/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . EjP (11/05/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Nomen Nescio (11/04/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . EjP (11/05/04)
      • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . ZZBunker (11/06/04)
    • Re: Republican *VICTORY!* +2 Days & Counting . . . Ian Stirling (11/05/04)
• Republican VICTORY! +2 Days & Counting . . . . Max Mustermann (11/04/04)
  • Re: Republican VICTORY! +2 Days & Counting . . . . Davoud (11/04/04)
    • Re: Republican VICTORY! +2 Days & Counting . . . . The Ancient One (11/04/04)
    • Re: Republican VICTORY! +2 Days & Counting . . . . Mountainman (11/05/04)
• Public Notice: Google is watching you. John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
  • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. William Elliot (11/04/04)
    • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
  • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Brett (11/04/04)
  • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Uncle Al (11/04/04)
    • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
    • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Tom Potter (11/05/04)
      • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
      • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
      • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Tom Potter (11/07/04)
      • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. John Schoenfeld (11/05/04)
  • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. Abraham Buckingham (11/04/04)
    • Re: Public Notice: Google is watching you. John Schoenfeld (11/05/04)
• force problem samanthag (11/04/04)
  • Re: force problem Randy Poe (11/04/04)
• Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? Jim (11/04/04)
  • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? AES/newspost (11/04/04)
    • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? Jim (11/04/04)
      • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? AES/newspost (11/05/04)
      • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? Jim (11/06/04)
  • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? David A. Van Baak (11/08/04)
    • Re: Can magnetic resonance be optically detected in room temperature? Jim (11/09/04)
• Dispersion: naive v. mature David Goldsmith (11/03/04)
  • Re: Dispersion: naive v. mature Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
  • Re: Dispersion: naive v. mature Andy Resnick (11/04/04)
• Saturn gets a shock Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
• The Pulse of a Nuclear Reactor Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: The Pulse of a Nuclear Reactor Rene Tschaggelar (11/03/04)
• Re: Photons Under Control tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/03/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 707 November 3, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 707 November 3, 2004 by Phillip F.Schewe, Ben Stein Uncle Al (11/03/04)
• An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/03/04)
  • Re: An industrial physicist? Rene Tschaggelar (11/04/04)
    • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/04/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Rene Tschaggelar (11/04/04)
  • Re: An industrial physicist? Null Set (11/07/04)
    • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/08/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/08/04)
    • Re: An industrial physicist? SPHINX Technologies (11/18/04)
  • Re: An industrial physicist? Ian Taylor (11/08/04)
  • Re: An industrial physicist? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/08/04)
  • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
    • Re: An industrial physicist? Creighton Hogg (11/10/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Andy Resnick (11/10/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? tj Frazir (11/11/04)
      • Re: An industrial physicist? ZZBunker (11/10/04)
• Re: Lattice plane idyllic (11/03/04)
  • Re: Lattice plane zigoteau (11/04/04)
    • Re: Lattice plane idyllic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Lattice plane zigoteau (11/06/04)
• YES ON 2 Alaska pot winns. tj Frazir (11/03/04)
  • Re: YES ON 2 Alaska pot winns. Ellen Simonetti (11/03/04)
• Hydrogen-boron Plasma Toroid Fusion erich (11/03/04)
  • Re: Hydrogen-boron Plasma Toroid Fusion Uncle Al (11/03/04)
• problem with force vectors, help! samanthag (11/03/04)
  • re:problem with force vectors, help! samanthag (11/03/04)
  • Re: problem with force vectors, help! Randy Poe (11/03/04)
  • re:problem with force vectors, help! samanthag (11/04/04)
• Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/03/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/06/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/12/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/14/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Oz (11/12/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/14/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Oz (11/19/04)
• Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? alistair (11/03/04)
    • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/04/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Hendrik van Hees (11/04/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? alistair (11/06/04)
• Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Einsteinhoax (11/03/04)
  • Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Uncle Al (11/03/04)
• The Flaw in High Energy Physics H. E. Retic (11/03/04)
  • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
    • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics Einsteinhoax (11/03/04)
      • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
      • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics tj Frazir (11/04/04)
      • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics Uncle Al (11/03/04)
  • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics Uncle Al (11/03/04)
• Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." G=EMC^2 Glazier (11/03/04)
  • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Kirk Gordon (11/05/04)
  • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Robert Clark (11/06/04)
    • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Robert Clark (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." John Thingstad (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." John Thingstad (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Robert Clark (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Rand Simberg (11/15/04)
      • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Robert Clark (11/15/04)
• Hawking: Iraq War A Crime A Brief History (11/03/04)
  • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime JM (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime TimeForAChange (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Baldin Pramer (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mitchell (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bill Moore (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime BrianE (11/03/04)
  • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Baldin Pramer (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Baldin Pramer (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime richard miller (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Winston Smith, American Patriot (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Baldin Pramer (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bill Moore (11/04/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Jack Black (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Jack Black (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime John Schoenfeld (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bruce Pew (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bruce Pew (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bruce Pew (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Poster2 (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime hanson (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime hanson (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Edward Green (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/10/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Simon Elliott (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Watcher (11/10/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bill Moore (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime hanson (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Alex Hunsley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Alex Hunsley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Go Fig (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime A Human Being (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Alex Hunsley (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Frank F. Matthews (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/07/04)
  • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Docky Wocky (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Winston Smith, American Patriot (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/03/04)
  • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
    • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Baldin Pramer (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime EggBert (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Ellie C (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bill Moore (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime David Goldsmith (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime tj Frazir (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Gregory Morrow (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Go Fig (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Charles Hawtrey (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime me (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Ellie C (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime hanson (11/03/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Shawn Hearn (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Shawn Hearn (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bob Cain (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Earle Jones (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mike O'Sullivan (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Maleki (11/14/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Tom Potter (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/13/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Jews & Electricity Frank F. Matthews (11/05/04)
      • Re: Jews & Electricity Uncle Al (11/05/04)
      • Re: Jews & Electricity Rich (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bob Cain (11/07/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Ken Muldrew (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/08/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Ken Muldrew (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/09/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime hanson (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bob Cain (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime A Human Being (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Bob Cain (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime devil (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Go Fig (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Go Fig (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Mxsmanic (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/04/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime robert j. kolker (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime Miguel Cruz (11/05/04)
      • Re: Hawking: Iraq War A Crime mmeron_a