Re: efdfdf
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required"
- Previous message: Mitchell: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- In reply to: ben ito: "efdfdf"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: efdfdf"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: efdfdf"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:43:07 GMT
ben ito wrote:
> The photoelectric effect does not *prove* that light is composed of
> particles. The reason people think that light is composed of particles
> (photons) is because they don't understand how a wave structure (wavicle)
> can propagate without dispersing.
That's bull***!
All particle (even buckyballs) exhibit wave-particle duality!
Did you ever wonder "What the heck is a photon, anyway?"
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/photon/schmoton.htm
What is the mass of a photon
http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/ParticleAndNuclear/photon_mass.html
Speed of Light [is now a defined constant]
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SpeedofLight.html
Particle Chart
http://particleadventure.org/particleadventure/frameless/chart.html
Special Relativity
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SpecialRelativity.html
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required"
- Previous message: Mitchell: "Re: Time is a Property of Matter?"
- In reply to: ben ito: "efdfdf"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: efdfdf"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: efdfdf"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]