Re: Double slit experiment explained.
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: EL: "Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability?"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Painful but inevitable resignation"
- In reply to: Greysky: "Re: Double slit experiment explained."
- Next in thread: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Double slit experiment explained."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Nov 2004 23:34:48 -0800
"Greysky" <greyskynospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<XF5od.24554$6q2.14339@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>...
> "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
> n le.
> >
> >
> >> And the tenet they forget is that time does not flow at the speed of
> >> light.
> >
> > "time does (not) flow at the speed of light" makes no sense. Try again.
> >
> >
> > [snip remainder, based on this]
> >
> Time doesn't flow because it doesn't exist. Time is an illusion we attach to
> our particular perspective of the universe, which is why it flows at
> different rates for different people and circumstances. Something that
> doesn't exist can't flow - so what does? Our perspective, of course.
>
> Greysky
--------------
Good for you Greysky
at last something is moving in peoples understandings
i hope you agree to my defintion of time:
'Time is nothing but movement (or translation) *comparison*
to some agreed motion (or translation) reference'
time is not an independant physical entity like say lenght or mass
it is a good human invented tool and nothing else
it can grow or 'shring'
only because of the relative movenet (or translation) of the
observed objest *compared to the reference object
imho, on day it will be understood that as a result of it
length of objests is not 'shrinking' and more important
mass is not shrinking now ''growing' (swelling')
- Next message: EL: "Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability?"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Painful but inevitable resignation"
- In reply to: Greysky: "Re: Double slit experiment explained."
- Next in thread: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Double slit experiment explained."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|