Re: Entropy is frame dependent.

From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/22/04


Date: 22 Nov 2004 14:57:27 -0800


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<gwmod.73969$SW3.30942@fed1read01>...
> Dear TomGee:
>
> "TomGee" <lvlus@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cc2dde17.0411220015.69016406@posting.google.com...
> > Jeff_Relf <Me@Privacy.NET> wrote in message
> > news:<Jeff_Relf_2004_Nov_21_d7hd@Cotse.NET>...
>
>
> > So are you saying that time does not pass in the center of a bh, and
> > if so, why not?
>
> Time does not pass at the event horizon, Tom. "Outer time" does not apply
> as time inside the BH.
>

It seems to me I read awhile back that an astronaut at the eh would
appear to us to be frozen in time as he acclerated close to c, but
actually we could not ever see the ship enter the bh because the life
of the universe would pass before the ship could get past the eh.
That sounds like time passes at the eh to me. Time is a property of
matter so there is no such thing as "Outer time" in the sense of an
absolute time dimension, but I am interested in why you think time is
different or non-existent in a bh.

> Entropy and time are not quite synonymous. Some processes produce a lot of
> entropy up front...
>
> David A. Smith

I did not say they were the same thing; I said entropy is a function
of time.
TomGee 112204



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Entropy is frame dependent.
    ... > Dear TomGee: ... >> So are you saying that time does not pass in the center of a bh, ... of the universe would pass before the ship could get past the eh. ... I did not say they were the same thing; I said entropy is a function ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How wrong is this analogy for the curvature of Spacetime?
    ... > Are you saying that the gravitational force is electromagnetic? ... > TomGee ... I've never seen a visible charge, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: My definition of force!!!
    ... TomGee wrote: ... > So, Sam, you're saying that AE apologized for nothing? ... > will that then make this a static universe? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: My definition of force!!!
    ... TomGee wrote: ... > So, Sam, you're saying that AE apologized for nothing? ... > will that then make this a static universe? ...
    (sci.physics)

Quantcast