Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google
From: MP (pet.antispam_at_onlinehome.de)
Date: 11/23/04
- Next message: John Savard: "Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- Previous message: Wally Anglesea: "Re: TRUE ORIGIN of Moon"
- In reply to: Tom Roberts: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Next in thread: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Reply: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:35:11 +0100
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote in message
news:cntqbe$gf0@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> Tomasso wrote:
> > Of course in scholarship you "should" cover all original sources, but
> > typically only notables are included. To do that, you either go to
> > the library or pay a fortune in download fees.
>
> Of course most real scientists have an affiliation with a university,
> laboratory, or corporation that subscribes to the major scientific
> journals, and can download articles from most journal websites without
> paying any additional fee.
Most, but not all
MP
- Next message: John Savard: "Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- Previous message: Wally Anglesea: "Re: TRUE ORIGIN of Moon"
- In reply to: Tom Roberts: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Next in thread: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Reply: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
