Re: APPROXIMATE ANCIENT TIME FORMULA BASED ON FOSSIL DATA (One Error Correction)
From: Hannu K.J. Poropudas (h.poropudas_at_luukku.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Next message: David McAnally: "Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws"
- Previous message: eleaticus: "Viewpoint and Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: APPROXIMATE ANCIENT TIME FORMULA BASED ON FOSSIL DATA (One Error Correction)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Nov 2004 03:16:22 -0800
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41A20EEE.A9E262F2@hate.spam.net>...
> "Hannu K.J. Poropudas" wrote:
> >
> > 1. I noticed one error in my old Usenet writing from the year 1991.
> [snip crap]
>
> Boy, have you ever got a long list of utter stupidity to amplify.
> Begin by surfing Google Groups and reading every bit of tripe, swill,
> drool, puke, and hind gut fermentation you have posted. Memorize each
> post. Visit a local public school ground at high noon and lecture the
> masses.
>
> That should do it.
Dear Uncle Al,
What is the matter ?
I'am sorry to see you have taken such unbusinesslike
direction with your comments ?
Best regards,
Hannu
- Next message: David McAnally: "Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws"
- Previous message: eleaticus: "Viewpoint and Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: APPROXIMATE ANCIENT TIME FORMULA BASED ON FOSSIL DATA (One Error Correction)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
