Re: Definition of A Field
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Is physics really a matter of belief?"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:40:45 -0500
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
>
> Where on earth is the problem??? I can simply *observe* in which
> direction something moves, can't I?
If you were in empty space with no force acting on you, could you know
(1) if you were moving and (2) if you were moving in what direction?
We know we are moving with regard to external reference points and by
feeling accelerations.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Is physics really a matter of belief?"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: Article: Scientists get their own Google"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|