To John Sefton on spirals

From: Sergey Karavashkin (selflab_at_go.com)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: 27 Dec 2004 15:14:22 -0800

Dear John,

I have to post this reply as a separate thread, since by some
technical reason, meanwhile I cannot post to the thread. Google team
of technical support is now seeking, what's wrong with my account.

On 2004-12-19 17:08:27 PST you wrote me on

"The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? (Double)":

I like spirals
> http://www.petcom.com/~john/

I know, John, I saw your site. But the point is not so much spirals
but their shape, and the main, the physical substantiation of this
shape. As I could understand from your site, you have no rigorous
physical substantiation. If I'm wrong, I would like to see it.

Happy New Year to you and best wishes,

Sergey

Relevant Pages

  • Re: To John Sefton on spirals
    ... Sergey Karavashkin wrote: ... > I have to post this reply as a separate thread, ... > technical reason, meanwhile I cannot post to the thread. ... > but their shape, and the main, the physical substantiation of this ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: To John Sefton on spirals
    ... > I have to post this reply as a separate thread, ... > technical reason, meanwhile I cannot post to the thread. ... > I know, John, I saw your site. ... > but their shape, and the main, the physical substantiation of this ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: To John Sefton on spirals
    ... >>I have to post this reply as a separate thread, ... >>technical reason, meanwhile I cannot post to the thread. ... >>I know, John, I saw your site. ... But the point is not so much spirals ...
    (sci.physics)
  • For Ralph Nesbitt about mineralogical terms
    ... I have to post this reply as a separate thread, ... technical reason, meanwhile I cannot post to the thread. ... to understand the correspondence in Russian. ... Sergey & Olga Karavashkin ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Quantcast