Re: particles without mass!

From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 12/30/04 

Date: 30 Dec 2004 09:02:47 -0800

Dear felow
if you just wahnt to succeed in your exams
you can go on parroting all the old stuff that the old parrots are
stufing you
but if you whant to 'understand physics* morover:
one day even to *innovate something*
than remember what old Porat (Porat - not parrot please dont confuse
it...)

any physical entity we sense directly or indirectly through our
senses--
*has mass*
it is only the existing fucken theories that cannot settle that with
some of their wrong assumptions
now mass must not be the ordinary one like as in particles
it can be in some basic particles that has not been discovwered yet
for instance if they are so tiny that our tools cannot detect them
but the fact is that our sight is detecting them!!
energy is ;
mass in motion!1 exactly as in macrocosm!
(energy is not just mass)
it i9s motin that turns mass tro vecom energy
similarly you cannot have momentum without mass
it is onlt sensless mathematicians that could dare and thing about a
sily
idea that there can be momentum without mass!!
momentum has to be transfered by something tangible
it cannot be trabsffered by ghosts
the problem is only with the correct mathematics *that is missing*
it is humans invention not natures invention- that momentum can be
transfered
without having mass.
now pld parrots preset it to you as 'thye last word'
but it is not the last word
i suppose you are a young person, so...
it is you! who have to find and settle those limping crippled theories
to something better
and mind you:
it is too long that this scince in stuck in the mudd
no much progress whas done in the lat decaded
a huge progress was done by *technology* not by the theoretic scince of
physics.
(theorethic physics of today asighnes to itself achievements that
actually
belong to the physics laboratories moslely private ones.
independantly by theorethic scince
actually
it is the opposite process that takes palce:
those experimentasl laboratories are finding and revealing new
phenomena
while the theorethic scince quickly
takes a ride on their backes to asighn it to themselves.
ie to say 'we predicted it' by our fucken theory
that is so abstract that you can 'predict anythiong with it
you can predict that a mouse will become a cat
and if found the opposite- they will predict the opposite
in one word-- too much of crookism is going on
because it became a business and a living of too many people
its more than time to realise it.
so
i just whated to make you a bit less naive and an authomathic beleiver.
---------------------
all th ebest
Y.porat
---------------------