Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics
From: tadchem (tadchemNOSPAM_at_comcast.net)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Androcles, one more try"
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- In reply to: caltechdude: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Next in thread: DavidBowman: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Reply: DavidBowman: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:55:40 -0500
"caltechdude" <caltechxtremephysics@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104439616.389566.241550@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Hey, when I wrote "Steven Weinberg who received the Nobel Prize in
> Physics in 1979 for unifying the two fundamental forces had the
> following to say.." I was referring to the Weinberg article. The
> sentences after "the following to say.." is my own words as side
> comment on it all before sharing Weinberg stuff. The "smithereens",
> etc. are of course my words as I am describing the thesis in our
> school.
So, you are quoting *yourself* in such a way that it would APPEAR you are
quoting Steven Weinberg.
Go away. Go very far away. Go someplace where liars, prevaricators, and
mendicants are tolerated.
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Androcles, one more try"
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- In reply to: caltechdude: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Next in thread: DavidBowman: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Reply: DavidBowman: "Re: Weinberg & Thomson Aether Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|