Re: To *Google* Out Of Plain Curiousity . . .
From: Nomen Nescio (nobody_at_dizum.com)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The elegant universe"
- In reply to: Zebito Coog: "Re: To *Google* Out Of Plain Curiousity . . ."
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: To *Google* Out Of Plain Curiousity . . ."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:00:04 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, "Zebito Coog" <invalid@nospam.com> wrote:
>"Anonymous" <nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid> wrote in message
>news:ZL6FZI2138351.4649074074@anonymous.poster...
>> HOW COME YOU haven't yet completely shut down the public
>> newsgroup archives? As anyone can plainly see, users can
>> STILL access the uncensored archives through the foreign-
>> domain servers, for example:
>
>Good job Min, Keep after them, Stay the Course.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Will do, brother. We've got 'em down and we're going in for
the KILL once our Patriot Act III kicks in, watch and see...
>I don't want Al Gore or others erasing internet history.
We sure don't, and that's why I'm grateful that our US gov't
maintains complete records of the archives around the world,
even of the posts which had the "X-No-Archived=yes" header,
which Deja News and now Google deleted from their archives.
And the foreign-domain work-around is still functional, so
anyone who wants to search the uncensored archives can still
do so at this writing. That's not likely to last long, though.
And this latest act of post-election supression on the part
of the liberals at Google to globally-censor the archives is
very telling as to how BADLY they are hurting in the wake of
November 2, 2004--and for that much I'm exceedingly grateful
to the Gods of heaven for making the liberals' lives so very
miserable! Even so, the liberals' global censorship of free-
speech expressed & recorded on the public newsgroup archives
clearly proves that it's the liberals who've supported censor-
ship from the beginning! But now, because the liberals haven't
got a chance of ever winning the Presidency nor of regaining
the majority in Congress ever again, federal law is going to
make life ever-more difficult and desperate for the liberals
such that I don't care if they take the archives down or not.
It's more gratifying knowing that liberalism is DEAD & BURIED
in America's political arena and will soon enough be likewise
utterly reduced to smoldering ashes and cast to the four winds.
Happy Roman New Year!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.google.co.in./groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQdS7ZJljD7YrHM/nEQL6eACgnIlVck4IR7IVHhKLun/MjgC+R24AnRII
GwApWuhP1girje1KQKUB642x
=wrnM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The elegant universe"
- In reply to: Zebito Coog: "Re: To *Google* Out Of Plain Curiousity . . ."
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: To *Google* Out Of Plain Curiousity . . ."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
