Re: Dear Greenfield collection
From: Guenther von Knakspott (guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de)
Date: 11/27/04
- Next message: Matt Giwer: "Re: You cannot boil an egg with zero point energy in ordinary vacuum"
- Previous message: Rushtown: "Re: A challenge to Uncle Al"
- In reply to: Eckard Blumschein: "Dear Greenfield collection"
- Next in thread: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Dear Greenfield collection"
- Reply: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Dear Greenfield collection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Nov 2004 23:54:48 -0800
Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@et.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote in message news:<41A595B0.8080103@et.uni-magdeburg.de>...
[snip weird ramblings]
>
> May I ask for a serious discussion of my assertion that, relative to an
> observing object, future events do never influence past ones, therefore
> future spacetime can only be a matter of belief in extrapolation but it
> definitely evades any access, and exclusion of negative elapsed time
> would remove apparent symmetry and complex redundancy from physics.
>
> I am convinced that my assertion is correct in ordinary physics. A final
> judgement which also includes micro- and macrocosmos is beyond my scope.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eckard Blumschein
Say Blumschein, does your model of time include the present? or did
you leave away the 0 for the conveniece of your crippled mind?
- Next message: Matt Giwer: "Re: You cannot boil an egg with zero point energy in ordinary vacuum"
- Previous message: Rushtown: "Re: A challenge to Uncle Al"
- In reply to: Eckard Blumschein: "Dear Greenfield collection"
- Next in thread: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Dear Greenfield collection"
- Reply: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Dear Greenfield collection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]