Re: Gravitational Time Porat

From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 11/29/04 

Date: 28 Nov 2004 23:57:31 -0800

macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell) wrote in message news:<9c3da975.0411281319.727cd54d@posting.google.com>...
> maporat@012.net.il (Y.Porat) wrote in message news:<4e35159f.0411280035.5d387a93@posting.google.com>...
> movement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --
> > > > > > -----------------
> > > > > > ok we start to agree
> > > > > > but a little correction (inho)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > not just the movement itself and alone but :
> > > > > > *movement comparison to some chosen movement *reference*
> > > > > > my assertion is on the *comparison* of those movements
> > > > > > it is something *relative* not an independant physical entity.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't believe motion slows time Porat but change in motion alone
> > > > > slows time.
> > > >
> > > > now how do you know there is a change in motion ????
> > > >
> > > > you know it only if ..... you *compare* it to some referenc emotion right ?
> > >
> > > No. There is a difference. Only the twin that accelerates will feel weight.
> > > That difference gives away who changed motion.
> > ----------------------
> > ??????
> >
> > 1 i though twe are dealing with time not with weight
> > what is your connection between weight and time?
>
> It should be pointed out that when there is accelerated motion
> there is weight;
---------------
i thought that when there is acceleration motion there is *force*
in general not just weight
weight is just a private case.?
now what is that to do with time?
if acceleration cuases change in motion
iot causes change in 'time'
now do you whant to suggest that *weight* is a tool to measure time??!!
if yes - how ?
2 even if you have a syetem to mesure time by wight ??
than it does not contradict to measure it by *comparison of movement*
to the external chosen motion refference.
and it certainly cannot be without motion and comparison of motion.

3 why complicatse simple things ??
-----------
Y.Porat
---------------

excluding freefall. This part of the equivalence
> principle does not seem to be talked about - weight and change in
> motion. Speed up and you'll always experience weight.
>
> > 2 the motion reference i talk about is *external* to the sytem
> > we test
> > Y.Porat
> > ----------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: If it doesnt work then its a kitten in the clouds.
    ... A heavy weight and lighter line replaced ... An Object in Motion remains in Motion. ... Sisyphus must push that rock or not push that rock. ...
    (rec.arts.poems)
  • Re: What is inertial motion
    ... First of all a weight cannot be induced to spin in a circle 'around ... to induce the spinning motion. ... force of one pound to hold it at that radius. ... > If it has circular inertia, as you suspect, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: What is inertial motion
    ... First of all a weight cannot be induced to spin in a circle 'around ... to induce the spinning motion. ... force of one pound to hold it at that radius. ... > If it has circular inertia, as you suspect, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Catapult Your Muscle Gains With Partial Reps and Isometric Contraction
    ... this is in your strongest range of motion. ... By working only in this range of motion you can use far more weight and ... Partial range rep exercises have advantages of being safer also because ... is performed by holding a weight in a fixed position with the muscle fully ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: A lock of wool, a bit of lead, and thou beside me in the wilderness
    ... >> well explained by Newton's laws, something about how the amount of weight ... > that a vacuum is a necessary prerequisite for motion and that the latter ... > renders untenable the idea of a vacuum. ... a grand piano would both fall at the same rate of acceleration, ...
    (sci.physics)