Re: Design for a conscious machine.
From: Hans-Georg Michna (hans-georgNoEmailPlease_at_michna.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: J. Todd Wasson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "spectral line quantization, and now sound knocks quantization; blackbody sounds"
- In reply to: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Next in thread: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Reply: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:30:06 +0100
On 28 Nov 2004 14:20:59 -0800, dsmyth2_@hotmail.com (David
Smyth) wrote:
>Consciousness and self awareness are unrelated to the actions and
>reactions of humans, animals and computers, and are not necessary to
>explain these actions and reactions.
What then would be its purpose? The above sentence strikes me as
totally nonsensical.
Hans-Georg
-- No mail, please.
- Next message: J. Todd Wasson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Previous message: Archimedes Plutonium: "spectral line quantization, and now sound knocks quantization; blackbody sounds"
- In reply to: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Next in thread: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Reply: David Smyth: "Re: Design for a conscious machine."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
