Re: Photographic Proof of WTC-7 Demolition

From: Tom Pain (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 12/01/04 

Date: 1 Dec 2004 03:56:29 GMT

CJS <BIG@MEANIE.COM> wrote in news:41AD1B71.5EB0F641@MEANIE.COM:

>
>
> Tom Pain wrote:
>>
>> CJS <BIG@MEANIE.COM> wrote in news:41AAA607.9095F560@MEANIE.COM:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Tom Pain wrote:
>> >>
>> >> CJS <BIG@MEANIE.COM> wrote in news:41A907EA.21D2E593@MEANIE.COM:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Tom Pain wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> CJS <BIG@MEANIE.COM> wrote in news:41A8F748.E7C0440F@MEANIE.COM:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "pain." wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> CJS posted:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> the firing of a missile into the Pentagon
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Dear god.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Planes leave debris. Period.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You mean other than the debris scattered on the Pentagon lawn?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think it would bolster your case slightly if it was 757
debris...
>> >> >
>> >> > Bwahahahahaha. Yeah, the "American Airlines" logo came from a
>> missile.
>> >>
>> >> What "American Airlines logo", you goofy ***?
>> >
>> > Do try to keep up. Even you Kamp Konspiracy loons posted pictures of
AA
>> > wreckage.
>> >
>> > http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
>> >
>> > Scroll down to where the lunatic photoshopped a picture of a cruise
>> > missile painted up with the AA livery and look at the picture above,
>>
>> You're citing a page that says no 757 hit the Pentagon as proof a 757
hit
>> the Pentagon?
>
> No, dumbass.

You cite a 9/11 conspiracy site as proof of no conspiracy, and think I'm
the dumbass?
 
>> I didn't realize you meant a *fake* piece of debris.
>
> Bwahahahahahahha. Right, Jason.

That is the consensus, and the gist of the page you linked.

Why wasn't it singed at all, for instance?
 
>> >> >> BTW, did you win that $100,000 yet?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Did anyone?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why not?
>> >> >
>> >> > Because the bet is a fraud. No scientific investigation can wrap
>> every
>> >> > little issue up 100%.
>> >>
>> >> Or at all, in this case.
>> >
>> > Yes. All those scientists and engineers who studied the damage *must*
>> > be in on it. God, you are pathetic.
>>
>> You're in good company. They're as dumb as you are.
>
> Bwahahahahahaha.

Yet they have the good sense not to blare it from the rooftops as you have.

Quantcast