Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap.
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 12/01/04
- Next message: Mark Martin: "Re: Dyson's 100,000 Gs ?"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- Maybe in reply to: Titan Point: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 14:31:15 GMT
Mike wrote:
>
> Is it an integer, a rational, a real, an irrational or a
> transcendental number?
>
> I mean, is it possible you have missed a few decimal places? Of course
> that counts.
>
> By the way do you know the difference between OWSL and TWSL?
>
> And do you know the basic truth that numbers without a story of how
> they are obtained are meaningless.
>
> Do you understand that in order for the earth to remain in orbit
> around the sun, its orbital velocity changes must be directed towards
> the focus of its elliptical orbit at instantenuous speed or something
> in the order of 10^10 c?
>
> Do you know that of 3-D space + time is assumed to form a 4-D
> continuoun there is no such issue because in such a medium nothing
> moves except locally?
>
> Do you know that what we observe is a direct falsification of the 4-D
> continuoum hypothesis and that c is the maximum speed for causal
> connections?
>
> If you do not understand the above plus more you are acting like a
> little child who tries to convince other children in his class that
> Santa Clauss really exists because of the fact that he got a present
> for Christams.
>
> Stooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopppppppppppppppppppppidddddddddd
>
>
> Mike
c = 299 792 458 m/s
See: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SpeedofLight.html
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/lectures/spedlite.html
- Next message: Mark Martin: "Re: Dyson's 100,000 Gs ?"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- Maybe in reply to: Titan Point: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|