Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen
From: Ken Muldrew (kmuldrezw_at_ucalgazry.ca)
Date: 12/03/04
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- Previous message: Rushtown: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Next in thread: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: Patrick Powers: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:08:56 GMT
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
> There are several competing interpretations of the actual
> "meaning" of probabilities. Frequentists view probability simply
> as a measure of the frequency of outcomes (the more conventional
> interpretation), while Bayesians treat probability more
> subjectively as a statistical procedure that endeavors to
> estimate parameters of an underlying distribution based on the
> observed distribution.
It would probably be better to say that Bayesians put their
subjectivity up front so that they understand how it affects their
calculations while frequentists hide their subjectivity under a rug
and pretend that it's not there.
Ken Muldrew
kmuldrezw@ucalgazry.ca
(remove all letters after y in the alphabet)
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- Previous message: Rushtown: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Next in thread: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: Patrick Powers: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability make any sen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|