Re: Theory of gravity
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: lvlus_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:52:55 -0500
greywolf42 wrote:
>
> You mean you want us to avoid SR (where Einstein used visualization, instead
> of Maxwell's equations), and you want us to avoid GR (where Einstein used
> the visualization of the elevator and the rubber ***)?
That was never an integral part of the theory. It was a parable to
explain the principes to the mathematically unlearned.
Einstein's theory is Eintsein's equations. It is all done with tensors
and Christophel symbols.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: lvlus_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: Theory of gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]