Re: USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)
From: tadchem (thomas.davidson_at_dla.mil)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: Andy Resnick: "Re: Why aren't they repairing Hubble?"
- Previous message: Andy Resnick: "Re: Physics and philosophy"
- In reply to: Maleki: "USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Next in thread: tadchem: "Re: USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Dec 2004 10:42:29 -0800
Maleki wrote:
> In your dreams, babyboys.
>
>
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/6c3ca1f2-4a2a-11d9-b065-00000e2511c8,ft_acl=,s01=2.html
>>From the article cited:
"The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog has suggested that
Iran's nuclear technology represents an effective deterrent that should
be dealt with through a security dialogue as well as inspections.
Nuclear inspectors have found no evidence so far of an Iranian weapons
programme. "
If Iran has no "weapons programme", then exactly what part of their
nuclear technology is acting as a "deterrent," and what is it
supposedly deterring?
*
*
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
- Next message: Andy Resnick: "Re: Why aren't they repairing Hubble?"
- Previous message: Andy Resnick: "Re: Physics and philosophy"
- In reply to: Maleki: "USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Next in thread: tadchem: "Re: USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: USA telling Iran not to study/teach physics? :-)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]