Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage
From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 12/13/04
- Next message: AngleWyrm: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Previous message: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Maybe in reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:23:10 GMT
"Eugene Shubert" <GalileoProject002@everythingimportant.org> wrote in
message news:1102962544.919070.83420@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> I'm looking for a few professional physicists who aren't afraid of
> sticking their neck out. If you have courage to address concepts in
> mathematical physics, then speak up.
>
> The defining paragraph to my unique approach to special relativity is
> in the last paragraph of my abstract:
>
> "This paper demonstrates that for any two inertial frames of
> reference in either a Galilean or Einsteinian universe, clocks
> can be reset thereby modifying the usual transformation equations
> into a Lorentz transformation with a new arbitrary constant c.
> This trick is exploited to derive the Lorentz transformation
> from the Galilean transformation."
>
> Do you find preceding paragraph, which appears in the current December
> 10, 2004 edition of my paper, scientifically possible or impossible?
> If
> you believe that its meaning is not clear to you or if you believe
> that
> the meaning is clear and mathematically impossible, then, for the
> record, please state your complete real name and the university that
> awarded you your Ph.D.
>
> If you say that my thesis is correct but that I made a mistake in
> logic
> or mathematics, likewise, please specify your real name, the
> university
> that awarded you a Ph.D. and identify the first erroneous paragraph or
> equation in the thesis.
>
> Thank you.
>
> http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
>
Even your adjectives are crappy beside be superfluous. "Delightful"
relativity... "wondrously" intricate. Have you ever READ a paper?
Nobody is interested in such sucky prose, and I've already pointed out
your circularity.
No, I'm not discussing my Alma Mater or degrees with you either.
Androcles
- Next message: AngleWyrm: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Previous message: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Maybe in reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Attention Professional Physicists with Courage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
