Re: "archaic" view of atom structure

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 12/17/04


Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:12:17 -0800

lindas4@aol.com wrote:
>
> Earlier today, I was told that the view of an atom as a nucleus with
> electrons in circular orbits was "archaic".

Archaic since about the 1920s and Legender polynomials or the LCAO
approximation. Archaic since p-orbitals.

> As I understand it (I am
> NOT a "card carrying physicist") this is, indeed a good, simplified
> view of the basic structure, and thus is useful for teaching and for
> calculations.

If the kid has two digits in his age he should be taught better. It
won't calculate squat. Hey lady - did you ever hear of... say it
softly... ACETONE? BENZENE? Why carotene is orange?
  
> In fact, this structure does occur. For example, it is
> present in hydrogen and helium atoms.

Craps out with beryllium.

> In atoms with a larger number of
> electrons, some electrons are forced into larger circular orbits, and
> some into elliptical orbits. Am I OK so far?

Christ, lady, crack a chemistry book.

> Also, as I understand it, the term "cloud" when used to refer to
> electrons and their behavior, simply refers to the fact that the
> electron, unlike a planet in the solar system, does not remain
> constantly in the same orbit, but moves away from and toward the
> nucleus as it travels around it (we all learned in elementary school
> science that heat will cause this to occur). Thus, the electron would
> look, to an observer, like a fuzzy cloud, and not like a clearly
> defined ring.
>
> Would a real "card carrying physicist", hopefully a physics instructor,
> please tell me if I am missing something here?

High school education.

http://www.orbitals.com/orb/orbtable.htm
http://www.shef.ac.uk/chemistry/orbitron/
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/aos/
http://itl.chem.ufl.edu/ao_pict/
http://daugerresearch.com/orbitals/
http://www.orbitals.com/orb/orbtable.htm

American zero-goal education has arrived. Every child left behind!

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Curvature vs matter by KST
    ... you call that a vacuum. ... But if you want it to be in vacuum then it must be in vacuum, and AS I SAID there is no such point inside an atom or inside a block of lead. ... no "point between the nucleus and the electrons" as the latter ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Electron energy levels force field
    ... About a hundred years ago when the Rutherbord atom was ... energy and eventually fall into the nucleus. ... suggested there might be something like energy levels. ... indeed energy levels where electrons can jump. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "archaic" view of atom structure
    ... > view of the basic structure, and thus is useful for teaching and for ... > electrons, some electrons are forced into larger circular orbits, ... > nucleus as it travels around it (we all learned in elementary school ... you are indeed missing the structure of an atom entirely. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Photons shapeshifting to wave prior to measurement
    ... but electrons moving around the ... > nucleus. ... deviations from their paths cause recoil of the entire atom and/or ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?
    ... orbits of electrons? ... I think the answer is yes, there are such interactions. ... magnetic interactions involving the spins of the electrons and nucleus. ...
    (sci.physics)