Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/17/04
- Next message: nuberpaul_at_nandomail.com: "CN Yang (82) to marry a 28-year-old woman"
- Previous message: Lewis Mammel: "Re: "archaic" view of atom structure"
- In reply to: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Dec 2004 19:55:05 -0800
In my model of the universe, motion is a property of matter having
temperature and thus being visible to us. How matter acquires its
motion depends on a number of things like, the BB, or us throwing a
baseball, e.g., or a volcano throwing rocks into the air, or being
captured by a massive body, and on and on....
I don't get your meaning about how smart am I.
TomGee
- Next message: nuberpaul_at_nandomail.com: "CN Yang (82) to marry a 28-year-old woman"
- Previous message: Lewis Mammel: "Re: "archaic" view of atom structure"
- In reply to: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Next in thread: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Reply: Nick: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
