hadronic physics and aether
From: Creighton Hogg (wchogg_at_hep.wisc.edu)
Date: 12/17/04
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Why absolute motion?"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Energy levels"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:21:28 -0600
My interest is strongly in QCD these days and I find hadronic physics an
incredibly rich topic, but I've noticed that here on usenet it seems like
all the theories proposed don't even attempt to touch the vast amount of
data on hadronic physics. For example, not only would an aether/unified
theory/whatever have to explain how you get hadron jets from e- e+
collisions, but they'd have to explain the ratio between jet events and
purely leptonic events. How would you explain parton distribution
functions with any of the theories proposed around here? I've never seen
good explanations of these things.
I mean, really, given the operation of things like RHIC I think that
trying to one-up QCD would be a pretty good test of a proposed unified
theory.
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Why absolute motion?"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Energy levels"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: hadronic physics and aether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|